Now here's a thought . . . .?
If you are ready for the adventure of a lifetime, try this:
A: Go to Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq illegally. Never mind immigration quotas, visas, international law, or any of that nonsense.
B: Once there, demand that the local government provide free medical care for you and your entire family.
C: Demand bilingual nurses and doctors...
D: Demand free bilingual local government forms, bulletins, etc.
E: Procreate abundantly.
F: Deflect any criticism of this allegedly irresponsible reproductive behavior with, 'It is a cultural thing; you wouldn't understand.'
G: Keep your British identity strong. Fly your national flag from your rooftop, or proudly display it in your front window, or on your car bumper.
H: Speak only English at home and in public, and make sure that your children do likewise.I: Demand classes on English culture in the Muslim school system.J: Demand a local country driver license or national insurance number equivalent
K: This will afford other legal rights and will go far to legitimize your unauthorized, illegal, presence in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq
L: Drive around with no MOT, tax or insurance and ignore local traffic laws.
M: Insist that local country law enforcement teaches English to all its officers...
N: Organize protest marches against your host country, inciting violence against non-Brits, non-Christians, and the government that let you in. Good luck! You'll soon be dead.
It would never happen in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq (or any other country in the world for that matter) except righthere in the UK, because we are run by soft, politically correct politicians that are too scared to 'offend' anyone.
If you agree, pass it on.If you don't, go ahead and try the above in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
EU Flag to become official for GB
PRESS RELEASE
Date: 20th October 2008
Release date: Immediate
Subject: Europe uses world economic crisis to “bury” constitution betrayal
Gordon Henderson has expressed outrage that Members of the European Parliament have voted to reinstate the EU’s national symbols of a flag, anthem, motto and public holiday.
Mr Henderson has accused MEPs of using the current world economic crisis to “bury” what amounts to a public betrayal.
The European symbols were deleted from the EU constitution, before being sold to the British Public as the Lisbon Treaty. This change allowed Gordon Brown and his Labour colleagues, including local MP, Derek Wyatt, to refuse Britain the referendum on the Constitution that was promised in the Labour manifesto at the last election.
Mr Henderson said:
‘The decision by the European Parliament, despite opposition by Conservative MEPs, to reinstate these symbols of nationhood is quite outrageous. This is a cynical move to introduce a European Constitution by the backdoor and British voters have every right to feel betrayed.
‘It is particularly galling that the EU has sneaked this vote out when the world is facing an economic crisis. With so many people worrying about losing their jobs and homes you would have thought MEPs would have better things to do than waste time making Beethoven’s Ninth the European national anthem!
‘I suspect the EU has taken this step now because they hoped that nobody would notice. Quite simply they tried to use the world economic crisis to bury this betrayal.
‘Derek Wyatt and his Labour colleagues denied us the referendum promised in their election manifesto, because they argued the Lisbon Treaty was not the European Constitution. Well that argument has been blown out of the water and it is now time to ask the British people whether at this very worrying economic time the country should adopt the European constitution.
‘If Parliament needs extra time to put a referendum in place MPs can always cut down on their proposed 24 day Christmas holiday!’
…ends…
Date: 20th October 2008
Release date: Immediate
Subject: Europe uses world economic crisis to “bury” constitution betrayal
Gordon Henderson has expressed outrage that Members of the European Parliament have voted to reinstate the EU’s national symbols of a flag, anthem, motto and public holiday.
Mr Henderson has accused MEPs of using the current world economic crisis to “bury” what amounts to a public betrayal.
The European symbols were deleted from the EU constitution, before being sold to the British Public as the Lisbon Treaty. This change allowed Gordon Brown and his Labour colleagues, including local MP, Derek Wyatt, to refuse Britain the referendum on the Constitution that was promised in the Labour manifesto at the last election.
Mr Henderson said:
‘The decision by the European Parliament, despite opposition by Conservative MEPs, to reinstate these symbols of nationhood is quite outrageous. This is a cynical move to introduce a European Constitution by the backdoor and British voters have every right to feel betrayed.
‘It is particularly galling that the EU has sneaked this vote out when the world is facing an economic crisis. With so many people worrying about losing their jobs and homes you would have thought MEPs would have better things to do than waste time making Beethoven’s Ninth the European national anthem!
‘I suspect the EU has taken this step now because they hoped that nobody would notice. Quite simply they tried to use the world economic crisis to bury this betrayal.
‘Derek Wyatt and his Labour colleagues denied us the referendum promised in their election manifesto, because they argued the Lisbon Treaty was not the European Constitution. Well that argument has been blown out of the water and it is now time to ask the British people whether at this very worrying economic time the country should adopt the European constitution.
‘If Parliament needs extra time to put a referendum in place MPs can always cut down on their proposed 24 day Christmas holiday!’
…ends…
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Survey For Landlords
I am just received a letter from the Licensing Officer Swale Borough Council asking me to update my Personal Licence Information, no problem with that but they also enclosed a questionnaire here are some of the questions:
What is your religious belief? Followed by a list, what has my religion got to do with me being a Landlord? They also asked if I was a Muslim, they are not allowed to consume alcohol so why would they want to be a landlord? Surely it would be hypocritical to serve some thing you think is harmful
What is your Sexual Orientation? What has that got to do with being a landlord or has Nu Labour brought in some new laws that states that so many pubs have to be run by Homosexuals, so many run by normal sexed and so many by Bisexual, oh I nearly forgot the A Sexual (someone not interested in sex). Does anyone care what the landlord is and what they do behind closed doors? Mind you the Bisexuals have it hard as there is no group promoting their unusual sexual habits, maybe they could have their own organisation called AC/DC Pride and the A Sexual would have an organisation call FAN (Fuss about Nothing) Pride. Stupid is Stupid does
What age brackets to you fall in? Surely this ageism once again what has age got to do with being a Landlord.
Do you consider yourself to have a disability? Yes I have a job standing after 10 pints. This one is unusual one because some disabilities would make you an improbable Landlord but why are they asking? Is there some physical test about to appear? Before you get a license.
How would you describe your ethnic group? Once again what has the colour of your skin got to do with your ability to be a Landlord, SBC then finish by saying “what other languages would be useful to you” IF YOU CAN NOT READ ENGLISH HOW DID YOU READ THE PREVIOUS STATEMENT. If people want to live in this country they should speak and write English, Council Tax should not be spent on producing paper work for those who are to idle to learn English.
All these questions were from the SBC Equalities Survey
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne
What is your religious belief? Followed by a list, what has my religion got to do with me being a Landlord? They also asked if I was a Muslim, they are not allowed to consume alcohol so why would they want to be a landlord? Surely it would be hypocritical to serve some thing you think is harmful
What is your Sexual Orientation? What has that got to do with being a landlord or has Nu Labour brought in some new laws that states that so many pubs have to be run by Homosexuals, so many run by normal sexed and so many by Bisexual, oh I nearly forgot the A Sexual (someone not interested in sex). Does anyone care what the landlord is and what they do behind closed doors? Mind you the Bisexuals have it hard as there is no group promoting their unusual sexual habits, maybe they could have their own organisation called AC/DC Pride and the A Sexual would have an organisation call FAN (Fuss about Nothing) Pride. Stupid is Stupid does
What age brackets to you fall in? Surely this ageism once again what has age got to do with being a Landlord.
Do you consider yourself to have a disability? Yes I have a job standing after 10 pints. This one is unusual one because some disabilities would make you an improbable Landlord but why are they asking? Is there some physical test about to appear? Before you get a license.
How would you describe your ethnic group? Once again what has the colour of your skin got to do with your ability to be a Landlord, SBC then finish by saying “what other languages would be useful to you” IF YOU CAN NOT READ ENGLISH HOW DID YOU READ THE PREVIOUS STATEMENT. If people want to live in this country they should speak and write English, Council Tax should not be spent on producing paper work for those who are to idle to learn English.
All these questions were from the SBC Equalities Survey
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Baby George
Latest edition to my family, 5th grandchild Baby George Mother my youngest daughter Susan. Married to Anthony Whitby with a daughter poppy. Born October 10th 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
ANGEL OF THE SOUTH
Whilst listening to Radio 4 there was a piece about the Angel of the South I knew nothing of this so I looked it up and below is what it is all about, briefly it is a Monument to celebrate the South of England. It seems there were 5 Artists who were short listed to present their work one of which depicted a White Horse as the this piece of art was to be in Kent a good idea but it is literally a Standing White Horse.
The Five Designs
For those who know your history you will know the Rampant White Horse name Invicta (unconquered) is the County symbol of Kent. Did you know: The white horse on a red field is said to be the symbol of the ancient Saxon kingdom of Kent, dating from the sixth to the eighth century. The horse specifically relates to Horsa, a fifth century warrior, who, together with his brother Hengest, defeated King Vortigernk. The first written record of the white horse can be found from 1605 in Richard Verstegan's work Restitution of Decayed Antiquities, which states that in 449AD Hengest and Horsa landed in Kent under the banner of the rampant horse. According to the radio programme it could be the oldest symbol of government in the World.
The problem is that Kent County Council and most probably most of the people of Kent (Kentish Man and Men of Kent) want the INVICTA HORSE not just any old white horse standing as though waiting to be fed but the BBC in their wisdom believe KCC should not get involved as the Artist has said he will not change his design. Well I for one have been proud to have been born in Kent and I love the word INVICTA (unconquered). What I suggest to KCC is to tell all those artist thank you very but no thank you as for the BBC stop meddling in the affairs of Kent.
You will see the designs attached
Five artists have been short-listed to design an Angel of the South sculpture in Kent.
The £2m landmark piece of public art will stand on a hilltop above the Ebbsfleet Valley, close to a former chalk quarry, two motorways and the Channel Tunnel railway.
Paid for by Eurostar, London and Continental Railways and Land Securities, organisers hope it will become the south’s version of Antony Gormley’s iconic Angel of the North at Gateshead.
The 164ft sculpture, twice the size of the Angel of the North, will mark the new Ebbsfleet International railways station and a massive development of homes and commercial space planned for 1,000 acres of former quarry land.
The artists short-listed for the commission are Christopher Le Brun, Daniel Buren and Turner Prize winners Rachel Whiteread, Mark Wallinger and Richard Deacon.
But we want to know what you think the sculpture should look like. What sight should greet rail passengers arriving in the south of England? What symbolises the south? What would you submit to the judging panel?
Send us your designs to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/main.jhtml;jsessionid=44QI40EJ424FBQFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?view=CAMPAIGN&grid=P9&pg=/ETHtml/content/promotions/mypic/mypic.jhtml&pc=mypic&_requestid=156358. By submitting your design you confirm that you agree to the terms and conditions
The problem is that Kent County Council and most probably most of the people of Kent (Kentish Man and Men of Kent) want the INVICTA HORSE not just any old white horse standing as though waiting to be fed but the BBC in their wisdom believe KCC should not get involved as the Artist has said he will not change his design. Well I for one have been proud to have been born in Kent and I love the word INVICTA (unconquered). What I suggest to KCC is to tell all those artist thank you very but no thank you as for the BBC stop meddling in the affairs of Kent.
You will see the designs attached
Five artists have been short-listed to design an Angel of the South sculpture in Kent.
The £2m landmark piece of public art will stand on a hilltop above the Ebbsfleet Valley, close to a former chalk quarry, two motorways and the Channel Tunnel railway.
Paid for by Eurostar, London and Continental Railways and Land Securities, organisers hope it will become the south’s version of Antony Gormley’s iconic Angel of the North at Gateshead.
The 164ft sculpture, twice the size of the Angel of the North, will mark the new Ebbsfleet International railways station and a massive development of homes and commercial space planned for 1,000 acres of former quarry land.
The artists short-listed for the commission are Christopher Le Brun, Daniel Buren and Turner Prize winners Rachel Whiteread, Mark Wallinger and Richard Deacon.
But we want to know what you think the sculpture should look like. What sight should greet rail passengers arriving in the south of England? What symbolises the south? What would you submit to the judging panel?
Send us your designs to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/main.jhtml;jsessionid=44QI40EJ424FBQFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?view=CAMPAIGN&grid=P9&pg=/ETHtml/content/promotions/mypic/mypic.jhtml&pc=mypic&_requestid=156358. By submitting your design you confirm that you agree to the terms and conditions
Am I Racist or has PC gone mad?
Am I Racist or has PC gone mad?
A new programme has come to our screens called Merlin, it about the Wizard in the time of King Arthur. Not the most ground breaking piece of TV but a good ¾ hour of escapism, so why have I posed the question “am I racist”? Well quite simply we have many villagers and soldiers in the programme who are black and one of the main characters is of mixed race. King Arthur lived in the 6th Century so how would Black People be in Britain? I suppose when the Romans left a Century before Arthur there could have been Black Soldiers in the Roman Army but would they have stayed on and integrated with the Britons? Maybe but it does seem some what tenuous. I believe that the Programme makers are taking Political Correctness to the extreme fearing that if they did not have a minority represented they may be penalised. Although the programme is just a story as is the Legend of King Arthur and there fore is not legitimise as an accurate historical fact but my problem is this just another way of some lefty producer trying to alter our history to make it more sanitised to the chattering classes who invent Political Correctness. History with all its problems is there and trying to rewrite it does not alter what happened.
So am I racist or am I a realist?
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne Kent
A new programme has come to our screens called Merlin, it about the Wizard in the time of King Arthur. Not the most ground breaking piece of TV but a good ¾ hour of escapism, so why have I posed the question “am I racist”? Well quite simply we have many villagers and soldiers in the programme who are black and one of the main characters is of mixed race. King Arthur lived in the 6th Century so how would Black People be in Britain? I suppose when the Romans left a Century before Arthur there could have been Black Soldiers in the Roman Army but would they have stayed on and integrated with the Britons? Maybe but it does seem some what tenuous. I believe that the Programme makers are taking Political Correctness to the extreme fearing that if they did not have a minority represented they may be penalised. Although the programme is just a story as is the Legend of King Arthur and there fore is not legitimise as an accurate historical fact but my problem is this just another way of some lefty producer trying to alter our history to make it more sanitised to the chattering classes who invent Political Correctness. History with all its problems is there and trying to rewrite it does not alter what happened.
So am I racist or am I a realist?
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne Kent
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Jamie Oliver and the Scroungers
Jamie Oliver
I have yet to watch the TV Programme where Jamie visits people who are on the Dole permanently and tries to teach them to cook. Listening to the Radio and friends who watched it there was a lot of disgust about women on the show who claimed to be poor but could afford to smoke, drink copious amounts of Beer and have a massive TV. The radio programme I listened to ask the questions how do we get this scrounger back to work, well I have a suggestion.
You have to accept that there are people in our society who are lazy malingers and would rather get something for nothing rather then work, by all means try an educate them and encourage them to fend for themselves and become part of the community but until you accept that they have different set of ethics to the rest of us you will never come to grips with the problem. So we accept that this group of people want to live the way they do and see no shame in living of the state, you can not starve them back into work but what you can do is to make life on the dole unpleasant by making it impossible for them to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, go to the cinema, go on holidays etc etc HOW? Easy you do not pay out any unemployment benefit in hard cash you give them vouchers. With these vouchers they will only be able to pay out for the necessities in life, they would not be able to sell the vouchers as they would be in their name and presenting them at a shop they would have to confirm their ID. No one would go hungry, cold or be unclothed but they would not have any luxuries and if anyone who is on vouchers is seen driving a car, smoking or in a pub they can be asked where they got the money from. Vouchers would have a stigma attached to them as people would recognise them as scroungers, obviously there would have to be a period of time says a year where you would be given cash because there are genuine people who may be in between jobs and they have been contributing through their taxes, as for single mothers they should only be given vouchers they should be made responsible for their actions and the father of their child should be hounded for payment to support his of spring.
I believe this will force people back into work, as they will not be able to buy take away so they will eat healthier, if they are at work they will have less time to become social misfits and when they have to pay for their luxuries out of money they have earned they may start to respect other peoples property.
Can you see any of my ideas happening NO I do not think so if this letter gets printed there will bound to be an out cry from the Left Wing Do Goode’s who will try and defend this underclass, it seems the scroungers, thieves and vagabonds always have a Champion to protect them, when will the Working, decent law abiding person get their Champion?
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne
I have yet to watch the TV Programme where Jamie visits people who are on the Dole permanently and tries to teach them to cook. Listening to the Radio and friends who watched it there was a lot of disgust about women on the show who claimed to be poor but could afford to smoke, drink copious amounts of Beer and have a massive TV. The radio programme I listened to ask the questions how do we get this scrounger back to work, well I have a suggestion.
You have to accept that there are people in our society who are lazy malingers and would rather get something for nothing rather then work, by all means try an educate them and encourage them to fend for themselves and become part of the community but until you accept that they have different set of ethics to the rest of us you will never come to grips with the problem. So we accept that this group of people want to live the way they do and see no shame in living of the state, you can not starve them back into work but what you can do is to make life on the dole unpleasant by making it impossible for them to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, go to the cinema, go on holidays etc etc HOW? Easy you do not pay out any unemployment benefit in hard cash you give them vouchers. With these vouchers they will only be able to pay out for the necessities in life, they would not be able to sell the vouchers as they would be in their name and presenting them at a shop they would have to confirm their ID. No one would go hungry, cold or be unclothed but they would not have any luxuries and if anyone who is on vouchers is seen driving a car, smoking or in a pub they can be asked where they got the money from. Vouchers would have a stigma attached to them as people would recognise them as scroungers, obviously there would have to be a period of time says a year where you would be given cash because there are genuine people who may be in between jobs and they have been contributing through their taxes, as for single mothers they should only be given vouchers they should be made responsible for their actions and the father of their child should be hounded for payment to support his of spring.
I believe this will force people back into work, as they will not be able to buy take away so they will eat healthier, if they are at work they will have less time to become social misfits and when they have to pay for their luxuries out of money they have earned they may start to respect other peoples property.
Can you see any of my ideas happening NO I do not think so if this letter gets printed there will bound to be an out cry from the Left Wing Do Goode’s who will try and defend this underclass, it seems the scroungers, thieves and vagabonds always have a Champion to protect them, when will the Working, decent law abiding person get their Champion?
Martin Clarke Sittingbourne
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
