The Archbishop of Canterbury head of the richest
organisation in GB condemns the Government for not raising benefits in line
with inflation as will force children into poverty.
Can not understand why when these do gooders try and put an
argument over they use children as their focus point surely a better wording
would be families. I happen to agree with Ian Duncan Smith’s assessment .We
need to get people of Benefit Dependency and back into work, making being
unemployed not financially viable. So we need to get rid of all the foreign
workers in this country who are not needed this in general means unskilled
labour, next we need to train more apprentices then we can rid this country of
all foreign tradesman. Most of all companies will have to pay better wages and give
full time employment, not part time work we need to ban the disgraceful Employment Agencies.
What annoys me intensely is the Church of England
complaining that we need to give more to the unemployed but offer no help to
those of us who pay taxes why don’t they dip into their massive coffers of
money and help the unemployed. Maybe the government should tax the Church more
and stop giving them Grants.
One Charity suggest that “A family with two adults and
two children needs to have £349 each week in order to be above the poverty
line.” That is about £500 a week before stoppages etc. that’s £26,000 a
year. Ask yourself how many unskilled workers get that
Welfare minister rages at bishops: There's
nothing moral about trapping people on benefits, says Iain Duncan Smith
• IDS
has gone head-to-head with the Church over benefits overhaul
• CoE
says capping benefit rises will push children into poverty
•
But welfare minister says the burden
on taxpayers is not fair
Follow us: @MailOnline on
Twitter | DailyMail on
Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.