The RSPCA is a left wing organisation with its uniforms it seems very
much like a Paramilitary one. I used to do Judo displays for the RSPCA this
stopped when they donated £1 million to the Labour Party to get Tony Blair
elected and look at the damage he done to the Country. The fox is a merciless
killing machine anyone who has worked in the country knows that and the best
way to kill them is to find their set and Gas the whole lot, at least Hunting
give the fox a chance and when they are caught death is instantaneous. Yet it
is far from efficient with the majority escaping but the main reason for the
Hunting Ban is a social Left Wing organisation’s like the RSPCA do not like the
people who hunt as the consider them the Upper Class so therefore must be
despised. You have to face facts you either leave the fox alone totally or you
accept the fact they cause damage to the Countryside and Urban areas and need
to be culled. I have yet to hear the RSPCA and their allies complain about the
killing of rats by terrier dogs i.e. Jack Russell deliberately bred by Rev John
Russell to be efficient Rat killing machines but then again they are ugly
horrible looking creatures. One thing that shocked me was the RSPCA Poll that
said 80% of the whole country was against Fox Hunting until I found out the
Poll asked just 2000 people considering there is 63 million people in the UK it
is far from accurate. The RSPCA is one of Britain’s most complained about
Charities, it is also one of the richest charities in the UK, its membership in
the last 10 years has fallen by nearly 50% according to reports. In 2003 RSPCA
membership was 39,000 2013 it is 20,000 Can you wonder why?
Once again a small minority like the Pink Mafia have anonymous amount
of power and influence over the 63 million who live in this country, I tried to
get the numbers of who belong to Stonewall but could not find it but I did find
out that their staff costs for 2010 was £1657,265 not bad for a charity? I wonder how many other Focus groups who have
a lot of influence but very little support?
% of population who are
gay, lesbian or bisexual
It is incredibly important
that this question be added to the census. Since the beginning of the gay
rights movement, one of the most effective ways for gay and lesbian people to
become accepted to become less invisible. Definitive proof that a reasonable
percentage of the population is gay or lesbian can only aid in making people
from all backgrounds and beliefs realise that they perhaps, know a gay or
lesbian individual.
Pete,
27 December 2009
FACT
2010 Census revealed that Gay people represent just 1.5%
% of population gay,
lesbian or bisexual?
Until the sexuality question
is added to the census, we can't even begin to guess what the % of the
population is LGB. Even when it is added, it will depend on who fills in the
census form, whether family members are out to each other, and whether they are
even out to themselves. Some might be scared of what the information will be
used for too. It is still very important that it is added, so that we are made
more visible.
Ric,
20 October 2009
The
government done as they requested and in the 2010 Census revealed that Gay
people represent just 1.5% not 5% to 7% as used by government and stonewall
which was trying to validate giving more rights to this section of the
community above that of the rest of us
Stonewall
has said there were 3.7 million Gay people in the UK well another lie 1.5% is
945,000 still a large number which should not persecuted but should they be
given extra rights NO. Here is what 63 million look likes in numbers 6,300,000
that is 5,355,000 who are normal sexual behaviour
Countryside Alliance chief urges members to stop
supporting 'sinister and nasty' RSPCA as they are now 'more interested in
badger culls than animal welfare'
•
Sir Barney White-Spunner urged
members to stop giving to animal charity
•
Former Army commanding officer hopes
a new organisation will take over
•
Also claimed the BBC portray rural
people as 'Neanderthal'
•
Attacked rural mobile phone signal
as an ongoing 'digital apartheid'
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.