And there are people who still want us to stay in the EU
EU says UK must dole out MORE benefits: Brussels takes legal action to force Britain to lift restrictions on migrants claiming handouts Britain could be forced to pay benefits to more migrants under EU plans European Commission taking legal action to stop restrictions on benefits Comes days after David Cameron pledged to cut handouts to migrants Figures show 24,000 families are currently claiming for children abroad By
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2854419/EU-says-UK-dole-benefits-Brussels-takes-legal-action-force-Britain-lift-restrictions-migrants-claiming-handouts.html#ixzz3be6UiRo6 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Friday, May 29, 2015
ECHR and Judges
There is a lot of talk about the ECHR
and about how the Government want to ban Human Rights, which is absolutely
ridiculous what they want to do, is to take the Human Rights and pass it into
British Judges Hands. Judges who far better qualified then those in Europe,
therefore forming a British Convention on Human Rights.
Below is information how these ECHR
Judges are elected, the one thing I found interesting is that they do not have
to be a qualified Judge “The Convention requires that judges are of high moral
character and to have qualifications suitable for high judicial office, or be a
jurisconsult of recognised competence”
jurisconsult
(ˌdʒʊərɪsˈkɒnsʌlt)
n
1. (Law) a person qualified to advise on legal matters
2. (Law) a master of jurisprudence
This to me says they do not have to be a
qualified practising Judge, can you
imagine that happening in a British Court?
Prior to the adoption of Protocol
no.14, judges were elected for a six-year term, with the option of renewal of
this term. Now judges are elected for a non-renewable nine year term.[3]
The number of full-time judges sitting in the Court is equal to that of the
contracting states to the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Convention requires that judges are of high moral character and to have
qualifications suitable for high judicial office, or be a jurisconsult
of recognised competence. Judges are elected by majority vote in the Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe from the three candidates nominated by each
contracting state. Judges are elected whenever a sitting judge's term has
expired or when a new state accedes to the Covenant. The retiring age of judges
is 70, but they may continue to serve as judges until a new judge is elected or
until the cases in which they sit have come to an end. The judges perform their
duties in an individual capacity and are prohibited from having any
institutional or other type of ties with the contracting state on behalf of whom
they were elected. To ensure the independence of the Court judges are not
allowed to participate in activity that may compromise the Court's
independence. A judge cannot hear or decide a case if he has a family or
professional relationship with the parties. Judges can only be dismissed from
office if the other judges decide, by two-thirds majority, that the judge has
ceased to fulfil the required conditions. Judges enjoy, during their term as
judges, the privileges and immunities provided for in Article 40 of the Statute of the Council of Europe.[2]
Thursday, May 28, 2015
Right to buy
Someone on Facebook was condemning the right to buy and suggesting people live on £2.50p a day her is my Reply
Have you read the legislation if you have why
are you talking
nonsense If you live in a Council house or Housing
association and then buy the house you are still living in the
house, the house has not been lost you are still living there.
In fact those buying these house are doing a social good as
the money they paid for a house will most probably build one
or even two houses which can be rented. Can you see the
logic Buy one get one free or this case maybe two. Its a win
win situation and the tax payer doesnot have to fund the new
house or houses being biult. Where do you get the £2.50p a
day I rent flats those unemployed get full housing benefit of
£470 pcm plus most of their Council and Job seekers
allowance is about £68 a week for a single man which is
about £185 per week or £26.42 a day plus unemployed have
many other benefits like free dental care, free NI etc. Not a
great deal to live on I agree but benefit was never meant to
be life choice These tenants manage on that money by
being frugal. In the 1970’s I had a wife and 3 children my
weekly wage in to days money £250 and the only state help
my family got was Child Benefit and I survived frugally but
comfortably
Have you read the legislation if you have why
are you talking
nonsense If you live in a Council house or Housing
association and then buy the house you are still living in the
house, the house has not been lost you are still living there.
In fact those buying these house are doing a social good as
the money they paid for a house will most probably build one
or even two houses which can be rented. Can you see the
logic Buy one get one free or this case maybe two. Its a win
win situation and the tax payer doesnot have to fund the new
house or houses being biult. Where do you get the £2.50p a
day I rent flats those unemployed get full housing benefit of
£470 pcm plus most of their Council and Job seekers
allowance is about £68 a week for a single man which is
about £185 per week or £26.42 a day plus unemployed have
many other benefits like free dental care, free NI etc. Not a
great deal to live on I agree but benefit was never meant to
be life choice These tenants manage on that money by
being frugal. In the 1970’s I had a wife and 3 children my
weekly wage in to days money £250 and the only state help
my family got was Child Benefit and I survived frugally but
comfortably
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Feminists loses
Many
of you will have followed my many debate with a Left Wing Feminist. Something I
really enjoyed but near the end instead of attacking my arguments she started
attacking me and my parents when that happens you know you are winning the
argument. This happened on other occasions when I have entered debates with
these Left Wing Academics, they all seem so pompous in believing because they
are Academics they are superior to ordinary people like you and me.
This
intelligent Ladies defriended me on Facebook no surprise their as I could see
by her comments she was very angry and frustrated but what did surprise me was the reason she left.
On
one of my posts I copied in a photograph BAN THE BURKA, she replied “time I
left”. She obviously objected to the comment but why? The Burka is a symbol of
the oppression and degradation of women in some parts of the Moslem world, I
would have thought that was one subject we would agree on
Those
Lefties are a strange and they have got worse since they got a right beating in
the election, just proving they out of touch with the people
Human Right and EU
Once again the Leftwing Luvvies think they know better then then the of us they forget they are ONLY Yes ONLY over paid Actors. As for the SNP they may have got nearly all of Scotlands MP's because of our weird voting system but over 50% in Scotland did vote for them and UKIP with just 1 MP got double the votes they got. They represent at most 2 million people in the UK at most a country which has 65 million
Folly of human rights luvvies: As actors fight plans
to axe Human Rights Act, how thousands of foreign convicts use it to stay in
Britain
· Number of foreign offenders on UK’s streets has spiralled to a
record high
· Includes killers, rapists and paedophiles who have avoided
deportation
· Left-wing luvvies lining up to oppose plans to scrap the Human
Rights Act
· Benedict Cumberbatch and Vanessa Redgrave condemn Tory proposals
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3098327/Folly-human-rights-luvvies-actors-fight-plans-axe-Human-Rights-Act-thousands-foreign-convicts-use-stay-Britain.html#ixzz3bKK6SxbH
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
History
will not forgive us if we fudge Europe reform, says Gove: Justice Secretary's
warning as Poland threatens to block PM's plans on immigration and
welfare
· Michael Gove said arguments for reform must come from British
people
· Polish PM has warned against changes that would 'discriminate'
Poles
· Cameron to go on whirlwind tour of Europe to drum up support for
reform
Sunday, May 24, 2015
37% Total Population of Irish Republic vote for Gays
Irish Vote in favour of Gay Marriage came as no surprise especially as the Media gave the NO vote very little coverage. I do not agree with Gay Marriage but the Irish were at least given a vote. I do not really care what happens in the Irish Republic BUT only 37.5% of the Total Population voted Yes, Not quite the success The Gays and secularist would have hoped for and I expect this deficit will cause a lot of animosity between Country and City
Gay marriage is not about equality as it does not give equality to those disgusting Bisexual or religions and other groups who do not believe in Monogamy. Also Civil Partnership is not available to normal sex people
Thankfully Gay Marriage is just a side show and does not affect the way we are governed and those of us who believe in Traditional Marriage will always believe that, teaching our children and grandchildren in its belief. Yet what concerns me is that Gay Activists have disproportionate influence in TV, Film, Entertainment, Media and now in Parliament. The latter continually bleats on about how it should be representative of the population they were elected for, well they have not achieved that with women and ethnic minorities but with Gays who are just 1.5% of the population they have gone over the top. If their wishes were to be applied their would be 10 Gay MP's yet we have 32? Maybe time has come for those wishing to become MP's be forced not use their sexual preference to gain votes
The problem when you change laws there are some unknown consequences below is a piece taken from the government web site on what constitutes a divorce
So if you can hide your infidelity for 6 months you are OK? If you have sex with someone of the same sex outside of your marriage you do not commit adultery, that is quite an effect on Gays
there is no provision for divorce on the
grounds of non-consummation of a gay
marriage.
That being the case Consummation for same
sex couples is no longer part of Marriage why
cannot same sex family members not marry?
Before you laugh this would be very useful for
Tax purposes, read article below
Gay marriage is not about equality as it does not give equality to those disgusting Bisexual or religions and other groups who do not believe in Monogamy. Also Civil Partnership is not available to normal sex people
Thankfully Gay Marriage is just a side show and does not affect the way we are governed and those of us who believe in Traditional Marriage will always believe that, teaching our children and grandchildren in its belief. Yet what concerns me is that Gay Activists have disproportionate influence in TV, Film, Entertainment, Media and now in Parliament. The latter continually bleats on about how it should be representative of the population they were elected for, well they have not achieved that with women and ethnic minorities but with Gays who are just 1.5% of the population they have gone over the top. If their wishes were to be applied their would be 10 Gay MP's yet we have 32? Maybe time has come for those wishing to become MP's be forced not use their sexual preference to gain votes
The problem when you change laws there are some unknown consequences below is a piece taken from the government web site on what constitutes a divorce
Adultery
February 2015
Your husband or wife had sex with someone else of the opposite sex, and you can no longer bear to live with them.
You can’t give adultery as a reason if you lived with your husband or wife for 6 months after you found out about it.
So if you can hide your infidelity for 6 months you are OK? If you have sex with someone of the same sex outside of your marriage you do not commit adultery, that is quite an effect on Gays
there is no provision for divorce on the
grounds of non-consummation of a gay
marriage.
That being the case Consummation for same
sex couples is no longer part of Marriage why
cannot same sex family members not marry?
Before you laugh this would be very useful for
Tax purposes, read article below
Elderly sisters lose ECHR appeal against inheritance tax
29 APR 2008
Two elderly unmarried sisters who appealed against a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that they should be liable for inheritance tax when the first of them dies have lost their appeal.
Joyce Burden, 89, and her sister Sybil, 82, of Marlborough, Wiltshire, have lived together for their entire lives and cared for four relatives. They inherited the house they currently share from their father, and have lived there for the last 30 years.
They have made wills expressing their intention that the first of them to die will leave her entire estate to the other sister. However, as matters stood under UK law, on the first death there would be an inheritance tax liability equating to 40% of the value of that sister's share of jointly-owned and other property exceeding £312,000 for the 2008/2009 tax year.
If they were married or able to enter into a civil partnership, there would have been an exemption to paying any inheritance tax on the first death. However, siblings are prevented by law from entering into a civil partnership, and so the surviving sister would have been faced a heavy inheritance bill. The sisters had complained to the ECHR that this effectively amounted to discrimination.
Joyce Burden, 89, and her sister Sybil, 82, of Marlborough, Wiltshire, have lived together for their entire lives and cared for four relatives. They inherited the house they currently share from their father, and have lived there for the last 30 years.
They have made wills expressing their intention that the first of them to die will leave her entire estate to the other sister. However, as matters stood under UK law, on the first death there would be an inheritance tax liability equating to 40% of the value of that sister's share of jointly-owned and other property exceeding £312,000 for the 2008/2009 tax year.
If they were married or able to enter into a civil partnership, there would have been an exemption to paying any inheritance tax on the first death. However, siblings are prevented by law from entering into a civil partnership, and so the surviving sister would have been faced a heavy inheritance bill. The sisters had complained to the ECHR that this effectively amounted to discrimination.
Baroness Deech: If gays can marry, cohabiting sisters should be allowed civil partnerships
ONCE YOU START UNPICKING SOMETHING IT WILL EVENTUALLY UNRAVEL
Saturday, May 23, 2015
Manston RAF Museum
I had the grandchildren this weekend so
we took them to Manston RAF History Museum. This was great place to
visit and surprisingly the George and Poppy throughly enjoyed.
Although this was mainly during the Second World War in the 1940's
not a great deal had changed when I was youngster in the 1950's, so
this brought back memories of my childhood. A time which was very
much what people thought was a traditional England and a time I
enjoyed immensely. Below are some photo's
You been waiting long? |
I love this time of year, the greenery still some blossom makes you feel good to be alive
What is this bird? |
A kent Cottage |
Milton Regis Prk |
Whitstable castle |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)