Anyone who deviates from the ‘acceptable’ limits of free
speech these days should expect to be treated as a pariah. Social media is a
release valve for show-offs, semi-literate losers and sexual inadequates. It
gives them somewhere to feel good about their own pathetic lives.
Starving? Let them eat Finish
Demand for food banks is levelling off, much to
the dismay of the ‘food poverty’ industry. Far from scaling back their
operations, they’re stepping up their war on ‘hunger’ and are claiming that
some children go days without meals during the school holidays.
I’m not disputing that a few families fall
through the cracks and need help. But the idea that ‘hunger’ is widespread in
modern Britain is arrant nonsense.
Most food banks are there to make a political
point and give meddling middle-class women with too much time on their hands
something to do — like the food bank in Royal Tunbridge Wells which offers an
Ocado-style home delivery service.
One of these Lady Bountifuls turned up on Nick
Ferrari’s LBC radio show yesterday, claiming melodramatically that many
families were only ‘one or two pay-cheques’ away from starvation.
Yes, pet. And your point is?
Most people manage well on little money, she
said, but can be blown off course by an unforeseen disaster — like the
dishwasher breaking down.
Eh? Just about summed it up. In this woman’s
world, having to mend the dishwasher is a reason for not putting food on the
table.
Who would watch their children starve rather
than wash the dishes by hand?
Everybody’s got a hungry heart
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3355407/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-BBC-behave-differently-Fury-wasn-t-gipsy.html#ixzz3u0meKIYS
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.