An interesting thing happened in the USA a Judge ruled that
the USA Government could not restricted people coming into the USA. Now this
Judgement was an interpretation of the US Constitution by one man a Judge, I
make the point interpretation. One man
can overrule the Democratically Elected Government on an opinion and NOT A
FACT?
When an individual including Judges makes an opinion you
have to take in account his or hers biases, so who was this Judge and what was
his political affiliation or leanings?
You now have to decide who runs the Country the
Democratically run Government or a non elected Judge (I presume in the US
Judges are appointed)
Laws should be made by the people representative not by
individual Judges. Now some will say that what happens and Judges cannot make
laws but just step back a bit and look at the Judges powers. For an example
something comes before a Judge and it is somewhat ambiguous on legal terms, I
am led to believe a Judge can make a ruling in such cases is that not making a
Law?
If this Judge wins and the USA Government cannot restrict
people coming to the USA could it not be that in the future another Judge will
decree that all restrictions on people entering the USA could be scrapped?
Judges are there to up hold the Laws decreed by
the People representative in this case the USA Government NOT the laws decreed
by the Judges if this happens it could end up in a dictatorship by the Judiciary
supported by the MOB
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.