Same Sex Marriage you must be joking
I have been trying to find out who cannot marry with this
new disgusting same sex marriage bill I am now told with regard to relatives
there is still a ban on marriage Below is a link to the new legislation, which
is long winded . According to all those MP’s and the tiny minority of
Homosexuals and Lesbians Same sex Marriage had to be introduced to bring
equality, plus some of the weird religions like the Quakers, some Jewish groups
etc. maintain it is all about loving each other. Well that being the case why
cannot Brother marry Brother or Mother marry Daughter etc. The reason close
relatives weren’t allowed to marry in the past was incest which is illegal and
because of abnormality of a possible child born in such a relationship. Now we
have same sex marriage that can’t happen, so this section of the community are
being discriminated against.
I contact a lawyer friend of mine in the USA because I heard
on a radio programme that the majority of people in the USA were in favour of
Gay marriage, here was his reply:
Dear
Martin,
I had a
spare moment and thought I would answer you e-mail below about whether the
majority of Americans favor gay marriage.
I have seen
various polls that say yes and others that say no. Personally, my
experience is that you can find a poll that agrees with any position you
want. The first question is to ask who conducted the poll and the polling
sample. The next question is when was the poll taken and where, as
opinions vary by location (especially urban vs. rural) and change with time.
My own
impression is that there is a hard core group on either side of the issue and a
larger, more ambivalent group in the middle whose response depends upon how the
question is asked. Among lawyer friends I sense a significant number
would have no objection to the idea of some form of legal protection for
stable, same sex couples who have made contractual type promises to one another
and entwined their financial and personal lives already and represent
a stable, otherwise law-abiding element in the community. Whether or
not this should be a separate form of contract based civil union or be included
in the concept of marriage is where the arguments begin.
Some
argue that under our traditions, individuals should be left alone and the
government should not even be involved one way or another, particularly if--according to
some--this is a genetic defect, in which case is should be handled the same way we deal with disable
people. Gays should have all the rights afforded to anyone. Whether
or not marriage is a right and whether a civil union adequately protects their
interests then becomes central to the discussion. The underlying premise
to this line of thinking appears to be that gays are minding their own business
and should be left alone if not affecting others. When they become
politically aggressive, this might be called into question, particularly when
some of the more radical groups also advocate legalizing polygamous marriages
or elimination of any age protections.
Couple
of really interesting points I have highlighted in red especially the one about
Polls. Ask yourself the question did anyone ask you if you wanted Gay Marriage?
I
believe this is so called same sex marriage is wrong morally and wrong in its
name if they do not include family members getting married. It is basically a
sup to the very highly organised and influential Gay lobby sometimes called the
Pink Mafia, the question we all need to ask why does just 1.5% of the
population have so much power over Politicians and why was it that no Political
Party included same sex marriage in their manifesto? Could it be the percentage of MP's who are Gay is higher then the 1.5%? Could it be they have a vested interest in having Gay Marriage especially as they have never consulted their constituants?
Same
Sex Marriage has become law, which we all have to accept, but there are many
people like me who will never accept Same Sex Marriage as legitimate. I wait to
see the outcome of yet another step by Cameron/Clegg who seem to want all religion eventually banned and so continue to promote the moral decay in the UK. Some day a real Conservative Party will return to
the UK but already the time has come when we can no longer call Britain a
Christian Country the rush to debauched Secularism with government approval has
become unstoppable
Once
again the Private School educated Millionaire Political class has shown they
have no understanding of the ordinary man
Anything
must be better then Labour running the country but only just
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/marriagesamesexcouplesbill.html
The bill is available to read in full on the link below in a
PDF document.
Relatives who may not marry
The following people cannot marry, in any circumstances,
because of their blood relationship.
Men cannot marry:-
|
Women cannot marry:-
|
Grandmother
|
Grandfather
|
Mother
|
Father
|
mother's sister
|
father's brother
|
mother's half sister
|
father's half brother
|
father's sister
|
mother's brother
|
father's half-sister
|
mother's half-brother
|
adoptive mother - see below
|
adoptive father - see below
|
Sister
|
Brother
|
half-sister
|
half-brother
|
Daughter
|
Son
|
adoptive daughter - see below
|
adopted son - see below
|
sister's daughter
|
sister's son
|
half-sister's daughter
|
half-sister's son
|
brother's daughter
|
brother's son
|
half-brother's daughter
|
half-brother's son
|
Granddaughter
|
Grandson
|
Adopted children and their genetic parents and genetic
grandparents may not marry. If they do, the marriage will be automatically void
(see under heading Marriages which are not valid) even if they do not
know they are related. Adopted children may not marry their adoptive parents
but they are allowed to marry the rest of their adoptive family, including
their adoptive brother or sister.
People who are step relations or in-laws may marry only in
certain circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.