£7600 to pay

In our local paper last week a Christopher Shrubsall was prosecuted for claiming Housing Benefit Fraudulently, he claimed £7,600 according to the paper he was punished by having to pay £200 in costs and given 60 hours Community Service something it highly unlikely he will complete if he doesn’t have to pay back the benefit his hourly rate will be approx £126. That is not a bad exchange and they say crime doesn't pay? But thankfully this is not the case he has to pay the full ammount he claimed back to the Council
Also in the paper Stephen Silk was jailed for 3 ½ years for counterfeiting £1 pond coins if he was such a good tradesman why did he not do a legitimate job plus why does he get 3 ½ years and the benefit cheat only get 60 hours Community Service? why wasn't he made to pay back what he had earn't that would be a harder job then going to Prison and we the tax payer would get something back in return

People Power

The Conservatives come up with a great idea People Power us tax payers actually having the power to improve our environment, schools and Police by being able start our own schools, sack Chief Constables etc. This not unique in some parts of the USA it has been going for several years. How many times have you heard people say "I do not Vote its a waste of time" or "once elected they ignore you" well now we have the chance to do something. Yet what do the Left wing Guardian, Observer say Oh No we do not have the time what they really means is "How dare the Conservatives let the people think for themselves, the peasants get the chance every 5 years" and of course the Headteachers association is against it, they know if there is people power some will be out of a job.

Do not miss this opportunity vote Conservative

PC and the Weather

The Royal Commission for Political Correctness,

announced today that the local climate in the

UK should no longer be referred to as.......

“British Weather…”

Rather than offend a sizeable portion of the population, it will now be referred to as

“Muslim Weather…”


In other words - 'partly Sunni, but mostly Shi'ite'

PC Madness

3 peoples lives have been destroyed by the Labour Government Political Correctness regime led by Harriet Harman fondly known as Harriet Hateman.
Roy Amore literately lost his life because of a PC Informers these people are like in the old days of Communism where the government encouraged people to spy on their neighbours
So what was it that he done so wrong He suggested to a black colleague that he ‘better hide’ when they noticed immigration officers outside their clinic, it was not his black mate who reported him, in fact he laughed it off, it was someone else who was ear wigging. He was so upset about the accusation he shot himself, I hope the ear winger feels good about himself. Read the article below

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265065/Man-kills-row-work-non-PC-joke.html#ixzz0kmGwfzOP

Next two experienced marines were Court Martialed for hitting a Bomber with a Wellington Boot. Yes, this Marine with 18 years’ service hit a Taliban bomber suspect, cutting his lip. When the accusation went to a Court Martial the bomber had escaped and could not give evidence has this country gone mad?


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1265111/PETER-HITCHENS-Two-war-weary-Marines-size-10-wellington-boot--destroyed-liars-Westminster.html#ixzz0kmEsGXzb

How can anyone in their right mind vote Labour

Read about Cambridge

The Labour Government have open the doors to immigration without a thought to how the British people will be effected It was pointed out that since 1997 when Labour came into power 93% of all new jobs went to Foreigners. Of course Greedy Farmers and builders want these low paid workers who will work very long hours for less money then there British counter part and before you say well British Workers will have to take lower wages British workers have families, mortgages, rent, Council tax, Road tax and insurance compare that with foreign workers who share houses 4 to a room, share food, very rarely pay Council Tax as for cars all they need to do is bring one from say Poland for 6 months then return to Poland and get another one no Road Tax and no record on our National Computer.Lets not forget a lot of these foreign workers are in the EU and are entitled to collect our benefits it is not unusual for these workers to collect Child Allowance in both countries and it is not unusual for them to claim for non existent children and we can not check.
A recent TV programme showed some out of work English people being taken on for a trial work period obviously the BBC picked a bunch of English losers with the exception of three Carpenter and two middle aged guys who were forced into redundancy. the carpenter came up trumps as did the other guys. What struck was the attitude of the Fat Red Faced Farmer who given three the chance to earn money digging up Asparagus because they had never done it before they were painfully slow. The Fat Farmers reaction was you are know good to me asked if he could give them some training his reaction was that would cost me money! So where do British Workers get trained? Two guys went to a packing station and they fared well after day they kept up with all others and told if they applied for a job they would be considered they applied and guess what there was no place for British Workers, What was interesting with these two they were expected work a minimum of 5 x 12 hour shifts 60 hour week, how long did the Unions fight for a 40 hour week so where are the Unions now when they are needed?
The Labour loves these immigrants because guess who they vote for yes Labour so we could have the scenario that we have a labour government voted in on the back of foreign immigrants.

What to do throw them all out those who want to work re apply with details that can be checked, those who have entered the country illegally and refused to give identity must be imprison as they have deliberately broken the law.

Why have I brought this up because the experimental jobs were done Cambridge shire and article appeared in the Mail about this subject


Migrant city's cry for help: Anguished letter to Brown and Cameron reveals devastating toll of immigration on schools, housing and hospitals

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html#ixzz0kgEJCeZC

Local Man for the local people

For the sake of balance can I reply to Terry Parker who tell your readers to “Vote Labour” There are many things about this Government I detest mishandling of the economy, increase in crime, increase in drug and alcohol abuse, massive immigration with 93% all new jobs going to foreigners since 1997 (Government Figures), massive unemployment for British Workers, how they spent more time debating Fox hunting and Homosexual rights then they did our soldiers going to war and then not equipping them properly etc. The Government of the day are judged on what they have done.
The last Parliament saw many MP’s from all parties being exposed as cheats even our last MP Derek Wyatt came under the magnifying Glass for expenses and where he lived and what he was claiming for? And it seems unjust that he takes the credit for Sheppey Bridge considering the hard work done by councillors form all parties on the local Council, mind you it doesn’t say a lot about Derek Wyatt that he can only boast two things that he has done in 13 years, I can understand him deciding to leave just before an election I feel sorry for the Labour Candidate Angela Harrison who had to be put in as last minute Stop Gap, So the time has come for some new brooms in Parliament to sweep out the rot of the last lot and that includes all parties. I have known Gordon for over 20 years I found him to be honest and his own man a local man, even the Troy hierarchy tried to fly in one of their special candidates but us local Tories stopped them and we had chosen a man we new and trusted. Dennis Grover complains he is to much of his own man and should be an independent, rubbish he like me believes the Conservative Party is the Political Party that hold most of his views not all and he will be great asset to the people of Swale and the Conservative Party because he is no a Lap Dog of the party that may be hard for the Labour Supporters to understand, remember the guy who was thrown out of the Labour Party Conference for heckling not much freedom there. In the 13 years Derek Wyatt has been MP for this Constituency he has never visited one of our International Martial Arts Tournaments we have held at the Swallows he has never visited any of the Martial arts Clubs dotted round the Town, Gordon has been to many and Sir Roger Moate was a regular visitor as were past Labour Mayors and LibDems Mayors like Brian Austin even though he was not a Conservative he was well respected and I am pleased to say a friend of myself and our Club If he were alive today and stood for Parliament Gordon would have a match on, two well liked respected men in battle sadly not to be. You can not blame Wyatt he was not a local man so did not know the people or the area and after 13 years he still doesn’t except for a few areas on Sheppey where they had Labour Councillors.
So I say do not just vote Conservative vote Gordon Henderson a “Local Man for Local needs”
Sorry I did not mention the LibDems candidates I am not sure they have chosen one yet


Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

GAY ONLY HOTELS

A few day ago I wrote a letter to the press stating that I thought the fuss caused by the Homosexuals regarding being refused a B&B. I thought this was a set up by one of the Homo’s Jack Mr Morgan, 56, leader of the Liberal Democrats on Huntingdon council in Cambridgeshire, as a gimmick as we were near an election. Moving on I saw an article that said some Hotel and guest houses cater purely for Homosexuals, after Googling I found a sight which cater purely for Homo’s and found lots of sights that were Homosexual Friendly (They use the slang word Gay) but was interesting I did find some which catered purely for Lesbian and Women only, Now does that break the law? Plus it did not take me long to find a Hotel for Gays only it is “GUYZ HOTEL Blackpool” On their website guyz.com there openly say the following “This Hotel is run by Gay People for Gay People” it goes on to warn Homosexuals about other hotels are trying to get in on the Pink Pound who not totally GAY “ If you are looking for a specifically Gay Hotel be sure to ask if it is exclusively Gay when booking to avoid disappointment” Now I wonder what the Labour party, Liberal Party and Mr Morgan say about that? Or is just Christians who can be persecuted?

The Militant Homosexual continue to bleat on about how they are normal yet they want extra rights, yet they still have reputation for Sexual promiscuity and sexual deviation, a reputation surely they would want to lose, thing like Gay Pride Marches promote this reputation but what I found interesting was the following advert on the net at a site Kent’s Gay Bed and Breakfast




Please note the Grey square which advertise Cruising grounds in Kent when you click on a link comes up to all the places you can pick up men for sex.
Well what do you think

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne Kent

Do you feel better in 2010

On Radio 4 they asked do we as individuals feel better in 2010 then we did in 1997 Well for one as Conservative felt fed up with Conservative Government of the Day I obviously hoped we would get back in Power rather the New Labour. Yet when Tony Blair got in everyone said he was a Tory in Labour clothing I thought are well give it a go. How wrong I was the last 13 years have been the worst in my life for me, my family and friends. I will quote my own details as we build up to the election

Revealed: Hospital has staff from 70 countries as nurses who don't even understand 'nil by mouth' forced to take English lessons
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263803/Revealed-Hospital-staff-70-countries-nurses-dont-understand-nil-mouth-forced-English-lessons.html#ixzz0kJ0FaETo

This article just highlights one of the problems in this country far to many foreigners who British Workers pay down. The argument in 1997 that we need foreign Nurses Doctors etc may have been justified but why in 13 years have we not trained enough Doctors and Nurses from our own Country? To say we can not afford better pay for trained staff is rubbish cut right back on the bureaucracy

My own experience with Medway hospital when it came to my two operation Replacement Knee 2009 Replacement hip 2010 was excellent my Surgeon Mr Samsami was top class as was his staff. The build up was a different matter 5 year wait for my knee with two cancelled Operations, appointments 3 hours late, 1 1/2 wait for a blood test was appalling but again this was an admin problem bad management
My own experience in have

Le Pond

How Eurocrats want to spend £1.1m changing the English Channel's name to 'Le Pond'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263468/Eurocrats-want-spend-1-1m-changing-English-Channels-Le-Pond.html#ixzz0kFnzJGcW
This article appeared in the Daily Mail how on earth can people and the Political parties continue to support our membership of the EU people in this country are losing their jobs and these idiots want want to spend a Million Pound

Cambridge Homo a plant

Monday, April 05, 2010
Cambridge Homo a plant
In my article about the Homo's and Bed Breakfast I mentioned that theses two same sex lovers could be a plant to cause trouble before the election and it seems I was right. It seems Jack Mr Morgan, 56, is leader of the Liberal Democrats on Huntingdon council in Cambridgeshire, so we are near an election a good chance for one of these wet LibDems who believe in anything bar the Married Family Unit and who believe the abnormal sexual act between people of the same sex is normal
No wonder they will never become a party in Government
Posted by CombatArts at Monday, April 05, 2010

Englishmans Home is his castle or is it?

Englishman Home is his Castle or is it?
Part 1
Since the age of 17 I have been active in International Judo and Sombo Wrestling from 17 to 51, I competed as an International Player plus I have been very active in the Admin side at home and on the International scene, in this period I have had to share rooms with other Male Athletes why because we were on a limited budget. In all that time I was never asked if I was Homosexual (I a not I might hasten to add) and that was in a time when Hotels would turn away normal couples if there were not married.
So the present fuss over two Homosexual being refused accommodation in a Guest House does make me wonder whether the owners of the guest house were set up by Gay Militant activist.
Maybe the time has come to look into the background of Michael Black and John Morgan did they know about this Guest house and did they deliberately tell the owners they were Homosexual, If they did, what for and why?

Part 2

I own Flats and Bed sits and I ask my tenants many questions:
1) Are they British, do they hold a British passport
2) Do they have a criminal record
3) Would they object to having a CRB check
4) References from Employers, previous landlords
Etc. What I do not ask is whether they are Homosexual or normal sexed, I also do not ask what race or religion they are, I feel that it is there own private affair.
Would I refuse to rent a room to a Homosexual Couple, as I would not ask I would not know? If they were trying to make a point by telling me I would have to reconsider because the question would be “Why are they telling me this, I never asked, have they some alliterative motive”
With regard to my Bed Sits I have had Homosexuals (I knew them as they worked for me) rent rooms but would not let them share a room as the Bed sits are in my house.
Some years ago I managed a Bar and Function Hall for my mother and had a booking for a reception after a Civil Partnership, my first reaction was take the booking after all business is business but I would get extra staff in, as the thought of men smooching etc did not appeal to me. When I told my mother, a devout Catholic, she said NO way. When I said there could be trouble she said God is my Judge not a Labour Government”
So well done Chris Grayling for telling people the obvious you have who you want in your own house.

Part 2

In amateur sports if you want a grant you have to fill in forms, in fact if you want to be a member of a governing body you have to fill an array of forms. Most of which has nothing do with my you want money but about Government survey.
They ask questions such as
1) What race are your members and you and they give you about 20 different varieties
2) What Religion are your members
3) Are your members Heterosexual, Bisexual or homosexual

There are many more questions but these are the objectionable ones plus the one that insist you have people from ethnic minorities on your committee even though you may not have any ethnic minorities in your club.

I forgot to mention ours is a Judo club and since it was formed in 1957 we have had a policy of welcoming everyone. So what has any of the questions above got to do with participating in JUDO?
In fact we have put into our constitution that the above three should not be asked as infringes there right to privacy.

This Government is obsessed with Control and it far to influenced by minority groups just because the media and Showbiz have a high percentage of Homosexuals and Bisexual does not mean the whole of the country is the same, Politician should get out of London and meet real people

Finally you may not agree with Homosexuals living together but you can say it is a life style but how can you say that about Bisexuals that is just a perversion

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

DRUGS DRUGS

Saturday, April 03, 2010
Legalise Drugs?
I have just been listening to a debate on Question Time about legalising Drugs the main thrust of the debate was that we are losing the War against Drugs and it should be legalised.

Those “For” quoted the amount of money spent and how we are criminalising people because of their habit and those who want to keep it illegal say we should get the main suppliers

Well I detest drugs and if I were in charge anyone caught with drugs would be jailed yes I would need more jails yes it would upset the Professional Classes whose offspring would be jailed and have a criminal record but everyone would think twice about starting on drugs as for those already hooked, collateral damage they had a choice after all.
Choice is the most important thing stop making excuses for addict etc treat them with disdain in the Great depression there was not the drug taking like today.

Yet after spouting of, what I have suggested will not happen the Politicians will not have the guts to do it, the Professional Classes who run the Politicians will not allow it and the do gooders who earn millions trying to cure these pathetic people will not give up there lucrative trade.
So eventually it will be legalised, and it will be taxed and instead of Gangsters making money from this evil trade the Government will! Those who want it legalised say usage will go down and more money will be available to cure addicts? The Government takes money from a substance that makes people ill then pays it back to cure them? instead of less people using more people will use because it is legal it must be harmless No government would intentionally give you something that is harmful not knowingly? Since the Licensing laws were relaxed there has been a steady increase in the sales of alcohol and alcohol abuse is common Moe youngster are drinking so much so by the time they are 14 it is a natural occurrence at weekends.
What of the work place will an employer be able to stop a worker using drugs? would they be infringing there human rights if they tried stopping them?
Final point why do you need to take drugs? are individuals that weak they have to say yes to drugs? Could all drug takers stand up and say Ba Ba

Martin Clarke
Posted by CombatArts at Saturday, April 03,

Student Brats

8,000 British students descend on a Spanish family holiday resort and go on drunken spree.
Yes Students those spoilt Brats who mummy and daddy say have got no money and when the finish Uni they are massively in debt. No wonder they are in debt they spend most of their money on Booze, sex and drugs. When they finish Uni they must have their Gap year this is a year where they swan of round the World at mummy and daddy's expense but we are told it is very important for their personal development and extending their life skills. Can you imagine a youngster on a Council estate being able to swan of round the world or what about the Kid who leaves school and get a job in Mcdonalds. If mummy and daddy want pay for them all well and good but stop whinging about how much it cost.

What they should do is stop grants altogether and put a percentage on the students tax when they leave Uni and gets a job he/she pays this for the full period of his working life before you start complaining, the reason they went to uni is to get a good job with good money so they can afford it. For those who enter a career such as teaching which compared to some jobs is low payed and it is a Vocation they could be exempt from the extra tax. Why should those on low wage help contribute to a Uni education which help them get rich.

They should cut down students Holidays to three x two week holidys this could then reduce Uni Course by a 1/3 saving everyone money


Finally do we the Tax Payer get value for money from those who have a Uni education???

Council Job's Worth

We need to get rid of these Jobs Worth's who work for the Council, take the women who sold the Goldfish and was tagged it seems you get a higher sentence for upsetting a Council Jobs worth then if you committed a burglary.

Have a read of Richard Littlejohns article

If this is justice, I'm a goldfishast updated at 8:06 AM on 01st April 2010
Comments (85) Add to My Stories

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1262676/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-If-justice-Im-goldfish.html#ixzz0jpwNKi1M

Coffee Shop Bredgar

On a lighter note for those who live in the Sittingbourne Area can I suggest you visit the Coffee Shop in Bredgar near the Duck Pond lovely little place especially in the Summer Tell them I sent you

VOTE FOR GORDON If you are stupid

Town Hall Nazis

As the eletion looms the articles in Newspapers become better and the reporting on BBC4 becomes more aggressive to the Torries I wonder why. I love this article by Richard LittleJohn

I never imagined the town hall Nazis would go quite so madBy Richard Littlejohn



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1261423/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-I-imagined-town-hall-Nazis-quite-mad.html#ixzz0jZcrhGdl

No to English Speaker

Dear Editor
One of my Tenants went for a Job on the Isle of Grain he was asked if he could speak Spanish or Polish he replied he could not, He was refused the job because the majority did not speak English therefore he could be a danger to the work force.
So now being English and living in England is a hindrance if you only speak English!
Do you blame the Spanish and Polish Workers NO the blame must be with the Government and Employers most who are English, who will pay these workers a pittance compared to English Workers. The English employers should hang their heads in shame as they greed is putting fellow Englishman on the bread line. Where are the Unions instead of getting well paid Cabin Crew to strike how about supporting the English Unemployed?

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

This is England

Married Couples stay together longrer

As some one who has been married for 40 years I obviously believe in it so I was pleased to see the following article in the Mail

Cohabiting couples twice as likely to part as married partners
By Steve Doughty
Statistics show that couples who live together are twice as likely to break up as married partners
Couples who live together are twice as likely to break up as married partners, according to an official analysis.
The survey of hundreds of thousands of families found that four out of five married couples were still together after ten years.
But in the same period two out of five cohabiting couples had parted.
Another two in five had cemented their partnership by marrying, and only one in five were still living together.
The study by the Office for National Statistics said that marriage was more stable than cohabitation even when outside factors that might influence the fate of the relationship were considered.

This means that married couples are more likely to stay together than cohabitees regardless of their age and whether they have children, and no matter the state of their health, their level of education, their social class or whether or not they had a job.
The finding undermines the claim of ministers that marriages are no more stable than informal partnerships once the influence of age and status is taken into account.
In January, Children's Secretary Ed Balls, who is leading Labour's campaign against Conservative plans to give tax breaks to married couples, said: 'Once you adjust for the fact that people who are married tend to marry older, be better educated and have higher incomes, you find it is not the legal form, it is the strength and stability of the relationship which is most important.'
The study was based on more than 750,000 couples who filled in the census in both 1991 and 2001.
It found that 18 per cent of those who were married in 1991 were living apart ten years later, compared to 39 per cent of the cohabitees.


More...The infidelity map of England: Study reveals where unfaithful spouses live

Among the cohabiting couples, 22 per cent were still cohabiting with the same man or woman and 39 per cent had married their partner.
One in ten of the cohabitees of 1991 were living with someone else by 2001, and another one in ten were married to someone else.
More than one in five, 21 per cent, were living without a partner. This figure was more than twice as high as the one in ten of separated husbands and wives who were living on their own in 2001.
The ONS said the reason for the success of marriage might be that people who want, or are capable of, sustaining long-term partnerships are more likely to marry.
'Those adults who are more likely to have stable relationships may also be more likely to marry rather than cohabit,' it suggested.
'Married and cohabiting populations have different characteristics and it may be these different characteristics rather than the partnership arrangements themselves that result in the differences in stability,' the report added.
Decades of research have shown that children from single parent or broken families are more likely then others to do badly at school, suffer ill health and fall into crime, drug abuse and unemployment when they become adults.
Jill Kirby of the centre-right think tank Centre for Policy Studies said: 'Cohabitation is no substitute for marriage.
'The assumption that marriage makes no difference to family stability is clearly wrong.
'The best prospect for children is growing up with both parents, and the best guarantee of that is for those parents to be married.'

Remember the English

Teaching maths

Maths in the UK

1. Teaching Maths In 1970

A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.

His cost of production is 4/5 of the price.

What is his profit?



2. Teaching Maths In 1980

A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is 80% of the price.
What is his profit?

3. Teaching Maths In 1990
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is £80.
How much was his profit?

4. Teaching Maths In 2000
A logger sells a truckload of timber for £100.
His cost of production is £80 and his profit is £20.
Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

5. Teaching Maths In 2005
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habit of animals or the preservation of our woodlands. Your assignment: Discuss how the birds and squirrels might feel as the logger cut down their homes just for a measly profit of £20.

6. Teaching Maths In 2009
A logger is arrested for trying to cut down a tree in case it may be offensive to Muslims or other religious groups not consulted in the felling licence. He is also fined a £100 as his chainsaw is in breach of Health and Safety legislation as it deemed too dangerous and could cut something. He has used the chainsaw for over 20 years without incident, however he does not have the correct certificate of competence and is therefore considered to be a recidivist and habitual criminal. His DNA is sampled and his details circulated throughout all government agencies. He protests and is taken to court and fined another £100 because he is such an easy target. When he is released he returns to find Gypsies have cut down half his wood to build a camp on his land. He tries to throw them off but is arrested, prosecuted for harassing an ethnic minority, imprisoned and fined a further £100. While he is in jail the Gypsies cut down the rest of his wood and sell it on the black market for £100 cash. They also have a leaving Barbeque of squirrel and pheasant and depart leaving behind several tonnes of rubbish and asbestos sheeting. The forester on release is warned that failure to clear the fly tipped rubbish immediately at his own cost is an offence. He complains and is arrested for environmental pollution, breach of the peace and invoiced £12,000 plus VAT for safe disposal costs by a regulated government contractor.
Your assignment: How many times is the logger going to have to be arrested and fined before he realises that he is never going to make £20 profit by hard work, give up, sign onto the dole and live off the state for the rest of his life?

7. Teaching Maths In 2010
A logger doesn’t sell a lorry load of timber because he can’t get a loan to buy a new lorry because his bank has spent all his and their money on a derivative of securitised debt, related to sub-prime mortgages in Alabama and lost the lot, with only some government money left to pay a few million pound bonuses to their senior directors and the traders who made the biggest losses.
The logger struggles to pay the £1,200 road tax on his old lorry however, as it was built in the 1970s it no longer meets the emissions regulations and he is forced to scrap it.
Some Bulgarian loggers buy the lorry from the scrap merchant and put it back on the road. They undercut everyone on price for haulage and send their cash back home, while claiming unemployment for themselves and their relatives. If questioned they speak no English and it is easier to deport them at the governments expense. Following their holiday back home they return to the UK with different names and fresh girls and start again. The logger protests, is accused of being a bigoted racist and as his name is on the side of his old lorry he is forced to pay £1,500 registration fees as a gang master.
The Government borrows more money to pay more to the bankers as bonus's are not cheap. The parliamentarians feel they are missing out and claim the difference on expenses and allowances.
You do the maths.

8. Teaching Maths 2017
أ المسجل تبيع حموله شاحنة من الخشب من اجل 100 دولار. صاحب تكلفة الانت‎=D 8ج من
الثمن

This takes some flying

This takes some flying

Read about a Real Man

This is a heart warming story, that came from a friend in CA




The future is not some place we are going, but one we are creating. The paths are not to be found, but made. And the activity of making them changes both the maker and their destination.

-- John Schaar




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You're a 19 year old kid. You're critically wounded and dying in the jungle in the Ia Drang Valley , on 11-14-1965, Vietnam . Your infantry unit is outnumbered 8 - 1 and the enemy fire is so intense, from 100 or 200 yards away, that your own Infantry Commander has ordered the MediVac helicopters

to stop coming in.

You're lying there, listening to the enemy machine guns and you know you're not getting out.



Your family is 1/2 way around the world, 12,000 miles away and you'll never see them again.



As the world starts to fade in and out, you know this is the day..


Then - over the machine gun noise - you faintly hear that sound of a helicopter..!



You look up to see an un-armed Huey!! But.... it doesn't seem real because no Medi-Vac markings are on it.



Ed Freeman is coming for you..!!



He's not a Medi-Vac so it's not his job, but he's flying his Huey down into the machine gun fire anyway even after the Medi-Vacs were ordered not to come.



He's coming anyway!



And he drops it in and sits there in the machine gun fire, as they load 2 or 3 of you on board..



Then he flies you up and out through the gunfire to the Doctors and Nurses.



And, he kept coming back..!! 13 more times..!!



He took about 30 of you and your buddies out who would never have gotten out.



Medal of Honor Recipient, Ed Freeman, died last Wednesday at the age of 80 in Boise, ID



May God Rest His Soul..




I bet you didn't hear about this hero's passing, but we've sure seen a whole bunch about Tiger Woods!!!

Housewife gets it right

Thought you might like to read this letter to the editor of a British newspaper~ever notice how some
people just seem to know how to write a letter?.

This one sure does!

Here is a woman who should run for Prime Minister!

Written by a housewife, to her local newspaper. This is one ticked off lady.

“Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was itnot started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so since?

Were people from al over the world, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan, across the Potomac from the nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania ?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11..

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called 'insurgents' in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind women and children.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the British media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.


In the meantime, when I hear a story about a British soldier roughing up an Insurgent
terrorist to obtain information, know this:

I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank:

I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and 'fed special food' that is paid for by my tax is complaining that his holy book is being 'mishandled,' you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

I don't care.

And oh, by the way, I've noticed that sometimes it's spelled 'Koran' and other times'Quran.'



Well, believe me,



You guessed it,

I don't care!!

If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends.



Sooner or later, it'll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country!



And may I add:


Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But the Soldiers don't have that problem.

I have another quote that I would like to add, AND.......I hope you forward all this.

Only five defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

1. Jesus Christ

2. The British Soldier.

3. The Canadian Soldier.



4. The US Soldier,


and


5. The Australian Soldier

One died for your soul, the other 4 for your freedom.

YOU MIGHT WANT TO PASS THIS ON, AS MANY SEEM TO FORGET ALL OF THEM.

AMEN!”



GIVE THIS LADY A STANDING OVATION. SHE HAS INDEED TICKED ALL THE BOXES

Gordon Brown Luvs Gypsies

Female campaigner for gipsy rights 'ran £2.6m benefit scam for Romanians'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256175/Campaigner-gipsy-rights-ran-2-6m-benefit-scam.html#ixzz0hZieqGxi

A campaigner for Roma gipsies' rights has been charged with helping scores of Romanians illegally claim millions in benefits.
Lavinia Olmazu, 30, and her boyfriend Alin Enachi, 29, are said to have masterminded a scam by which 172 Romanians claimed £2.6million.
Olmazu, who was arrested last week, was working as an 'inclusivity outreach worker' to Roma gipsies for both Haringey and Waltham Forest councils in North London.
Fake documents: Lavinia Olmazu allegedly helped Romanian migrants to claim millions in benefits
The academic, who has campaigned for greater understanding of gipsy culture, is accused with Enachi of using a supposedly charitable organisation called Roma Concern to help coordinate the fraud.
The couple appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Friday alongside six gipsies, each of whom is alleged to have pocketed thousands of pounds from the scam.


Under rules introduced when Romania joined the EU in 2006, Romanian migrants cannot get a National Insurance number - which is the key to getting benefits - unless they can prove they have paid employment




These Gypies can not help themselves it is in theie culture to lie cheat and steal so why was they let into the country another reason to get rid of this government and come out of the eu

Cameron luvs Homosexualls

I can not believe that people will still vote Labour and Brown in the next election but according to the Polls it looks as if they will get a victory. One must ask the question could all the immigrants hold the balance of power in a future election? if so was this orchestrated by the Labour party?

But Cameron's does shoot himself in the foot sometimes instead reassuring the Conservative faithful by keeping to some of their values I refer to:


After Tory leader reveals his list of ethnic and gay candidates,

Cameron's Rainbow 1st
In the latest development in his campaign to show how dramatically the Tories have changed, David Cameron has published the party’s first-ever official list of openly gay MPs.
The Conservatives say they have 20 openly gay candidates standing in the Election. Of those, 11 told party chiefs they were ‘happy’ to be named in the first authorised list of gay Conservative candidates.
It has led some to suggest jokingly that the Tories might change the party’s traditional blue colour to the rainbow flag of the gay movement.Who cares what their sexual preferences are what should be said can they do the job, to be honest if I was a Conservative and live in a constituency that had a Parliamentary Candidate imposed by Central Office I would not vote

Our priority is to get rid of this government not mess around with Cameron's new friends

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256098/After-Tory-leader-reveals-list-ethnic-candidates-Camerons-Rainbow-1st-Eleven.html#ixzz0hTlHJ6xU

IMMIGRANTS AGAIN

British taxpayers to fork out millions more in benefits for EU migrantsBy Christopher Leake
Last updated at 1:11 AM on 07th March 2010
Comments (0) Add to My Stories Taxpayers face paying millions of pounds in extra benefits to Eastern European immigrants because of changes to EU regulations.

For the past seven years, immigrants from eight countries due to become full members of the EU were banned from claiming benefits in the UK until they had worked here for 12 months.

But from April 2011, immigrants from Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia and the Czech Republic – where income levels are 40 per cent of the European average – will be allowed to claim Jobseekers’ Allowance and other benefits after


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256108/British-taxpayers-fork-millions-benefits-EU-migrants.html#ixzz0hTiIK63n

This is provided they can prove that they have been actively seeking work, undergone training or attended job interviews.

Unlike many other European nations which closed their labour markets to the so-called Accession Eight countries, Britain has allowed their nationals to work here.

This was on condition that they abided by the Government’s Worker Registration Scheme, which denied them benefits for a year.

More...Labour's migrant policy has damaged my son's education, says Minister

But the scheme runs out next spring because seven years is the maximum transition period under EU law and no extension can be granted.

It means Eastern European immigrants entering Britain will be subject to the same benefits rules as they are in established EU countries like France and Germany.

Although there are no official Government figures, the latest academic surveys suggest there are now 1.2 million Eastern European nationals living in Britain.

Most former Soviet bloc countries pay lower unemployment benefits than Britain. In Latvia, the monthly unemployment allowance is £57.20 compared with the UK’s £200-£256.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch UK, said last night: ‘Now is the time to engage the EU in a renegotiation of the welfare arrangements to ensure that we do not face a wave of benefit shoppers when these countries become full members.’

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: ‘Of those who do come here, the vast majority do not claim benefits.’



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256108/British-taxpayers-fork-millions-benefits-EU-migrants.html#ixzz0hTilWq7w

Truth abou Foot

Why is it as soon as a Politician dies he becomes a hero Take Michael Foot left wing friend of the Russians someone who wanted GB to become a communist state well read

Good Old Footy? No, a dangerous, deluded hypocrite
By Richard Littlejohn
Last updated
Someone telling the truth

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1255529/Michael-Foot-good-Old-Footy-No-dangerous-deluded-hypocrite.html#ixzz0hIG8Kuxl

CIVIL PARTNERSHIP

CIVIL PARTNERSHIP
When the Civil Partnership started to be muted and thought of I thought what a good idea, I know it was instigated by Homosexuals and their friends, but why should two people who have lived together for along time and contributed to each others mode of living not have protection under the law but as usual an excellent idea got high jacked by a small minority. Initially I was led to believe this was not about a person’s sexual preference but putting a wrong right. There were many people who live together for years but do not have a sexual relationship which were not treated fairly under the law for example an Uncle and nephew, aunt and niece, two spinsters, two brothers or just a couple of friends I could go on. My idea of this civil partnership was that the couple would go to a magistrate and sign up for a Civil Partnership very much like a business partnership but no the militant Homosexual lobby had to make it into an alternative to marriage and only for those who were Lesbian and Homosexual a blatant act of discrimination. A good idea ruined.
The latest attack for the Homo Militants is the Church they demand that Lesbians and Homosexuals can get married in Church and it seems that once again with help by the Government they will get their way. The first question I must ask what right has the government to get involved in religion? Can I remind our politician what Jesus said Luke 20:25 And He said to them, "Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." You politicians deal with Man’s Law not God’s Law. It says something about a government that they want to change the way we worship and what we are to believe in. Most of the main religions believe that Homosexual Act is sinful and most preach forgiveness of sins i.e. you can not change what you are but do not practise the physical act. You may not agree with that statement but it is a fact and if you want carry on that life style that is for you decide rightly so and you should not be persecuted for that fact. Yet Homosexuals should also respect the fact that not everyone agree with what they do I would suggest the great majority.
Marriage is about the unification of two people the extension of the family and the procreation of children and if done in a Church it is of very high religious significance for Catholics it is a sacrament. Marriage is not a way to make a political statement by some militant organisation.
I will put my trust in God before I put my trust in a Government

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

Are you a traitor if you vote Labour

I am quite open when it comes to supporting the Conservative Party not because it is necessarily the party that represents my views but because of our voting system you really only have a choice of two parties Labour or Conservative the others are no more the a protest vote. What I can not understand is the recent polls showing the Labour party in with a chance to win the next Election, Here is a party and government that has all but destroyed this country, it lied about referendums,wars, bullying, NHS it squanders our money puts Englishman on the dole but lets immigrants flood in and people still vote for them. I consider anyone WHO votes Labour a traitor to the true people of England ,.

More Sex education

New Sex education
Once again this Government has stepped into what families can do they are in the process of making sex education and relationships compulsory in schools starting at the age of 5 years part of that education is to teach about how Homosexuality and Bisexuals being normal at least religious schools have an opt out of this degusting piece of legislation, I believe all parents should have the right to opt out of discussing sex outside of marriage and deviant sexual acts.
When will these so called experts realise the more you teach kids the more they will try it out. During the 1960’s I was at secondary School in our first year we learnt about reproduction system and that was it on the sex education because of this the experts said we ignorant of sex and children should be taught much more about the sexual act, interestingly enough those same experts were into the latest rages FLOWER POWER, free love, drugs and booze etc could it be if everyone done what they were doing they could justify their debauched behaviour. Can I say when I got married at 20 I knew no one who was pregnant under 16, I knew no one who was living together and I only new one divorced couple and that was in the day when we were ignorant of sex and contraception compare that with today when children are told everything they need to know about sex: Crèches in most schools, 51% of all single mothers living in accommodation paid for by the state something they have not even contributed to, sex becoming just a pastime and physical act.
I am pleased to say I am not the only one who thinks this way , here are two articles from newspapers:
A staggering 40,000 — or 40 per 1,000 — under-18s still fall pregnant in Britain each year, a pitiful improvement on 1998, when the figure was 46.6 per 1,000.
What makes these statistics most depressing, however, is the staggering amount of energy and taxpayers’ money that ministers have squandered on their teenage pregnancy programme.
More than £280million has been spent on contraception and sex education — and this has barely made a dent in the problem.
But instead of accepting its mistake and trying a different approach, the Government continues to cling to its discredited strategy of dishing out sex advice, pills and condoms.
Albert Einstein once said that the definition of insanity was ‘doing the same thing, over and over again, and expecting different results’.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1253631/BRENDA-ALMOND-Well-end-teenage-pregnancy-epidemic-admit-whats-REALLY-causing-it.html#ixzz0gdAfiNDC

'Deterrent' is a dirty word for dealing with teen mothers By Jan Moir

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1253904/Deterrent-dirty-word-dealing-teen-mothers.html#ixzz0gdBUvXPt

To finalise is it not about time that we looked into the background of these so called Sex Experts because they seem a rather strange bunch who want to encourage children to experience sex and talk about sex if another adult suggested they would be classified as a potential paedophile


M clarke

Jobs for Sittingbourne people

Dear Editor
Last week I wrote an article about the new houses at Bapchild and asked through your paper if Swale Borough Council would insure that local people got the job of building the houses rather then giving foreign labour all the work his reply was as follows:

Dear Martin
We shall seek to encourage all Companies that apply for planning permissions to employ and TRAIN local labour and craftsmen.

I have known Andrew for many years and have always found him trustworthy and honest, so hopefully some local people may get work to help feed their families in desperate times, as of yet I have had no response from our local MP


Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

Government drew up secret plans to increase immigration... but feared 'racist' backlash | Mail Online

Secret Labour plan to increase immigration for social reasons dismissed public's opposition as 'racist'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1252926/Government-drew-secret-plans-increase-immigration--feared-racist-backlash.html#ixzz0gLj58tDg


Government drew up secret plans to increase immigration... but feared 'racist' backlash | Mail Online

Best survey ever

Last month a world-wide Phone survey was conducted by the UN. The only question asked was:-
"Would you please give your honest opinion about solutions to the food shortage in the rest of the world?"
The survey was a huge failure because of the following:
In Eastern Europe they didn't know what "honest" meant.
In Western Europe they didn't know what "shortage" meant.
In Africa they didn't know what "food" meant.
In China they didn't know what "opinion" meant.
In the Middle East they didn't know what "solution" meant.
In South America they didn't know what "please" meant.
In the US they didn't know what "the rest of the world"
Meant.

And
Finally.........................
In Australia they hung up because they couldn't understand the Indian accent.

OBAMA most outrageous statement

It seems President Obama is not as popular in the US as the rest of the world is led to believe a friend of mine from the Big Sky country USA sent me the following item. Do you think our Prime Minister thinks the same

This is truly hard to believe

THIS HAS GOT TO BE THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENT EVER MADE BY A PUBLIC OFFICIAL LET ALONE BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.. AND THIS GUY IS OUR "COMMANDER IN CHIEF".

THIS MOST UNBELIEVABLE PRESIDENT?
HERE IS HIS RESPONSE WHEN HE BACKED OFF FROM HIS DECISION TO REQUIRE THE MILITARY PAY FOR THEIR WAR INJURIES.


Bad press, including major mockery of the plan by comedian Jon Stewart, led to President Obama abandoning his proposal to require veterans carry private health insurance to cover the estimated $540 million annual cost to the federal government of treatment for injuries to military personnel received during their tours on active duty. The President admitted that he was puzzled by the magnitude of the opposition to his proposal.

"Look, it's an all volunteer force," Obama complained. "Nobody made these guys go to war. They had to have known and accepted the risks. Now they whine about bearing the costs of their choice? It doesn't compute.." "I thought these were people who were proud to sacrifice for their country, "Obama continued "I wasn't asking for blood, just money. With the country facing the worst financial crisis in its history, I'd have thought that the patriotic thing to do would be to try to help reduce the nation's deficit. I guess I underestimated the
selfishness of some of my fellow Americans."


Please pass this on to every one including every vet and their families whom you know. How in the world did a person with this mindset become our leader?

REMEMBER THIS STATEMENT... "Nobody made these guys go to war. They had to have known and accepted the risks. Now they whine about bearing the costs of their choice?"


If he thinks he will ever get another vote from an Active Duty, Reserve, National Guard service member or veteran of a military service he ought to think it over.. If you or a family member is or has served their country please pass this to them.

Please pass this to everyone.
I'm guessing that other than the 20-25 percent hardcore liberals in the US will agree that this is just another example why this is the worst president in American history. Remind everyone over and over how this man thinks, while he bows to the Saudi Arabian king.

Martin Seen with tight shorts

A friend of mine in the USDA replied to my blog on What do Homo's want


Martin,

I just don't know about you. I have personally seen you in tight shorts rolling around with other blokes. You seemed to enjoy putting your arms around them and pressing your body on theirs. Most of them just surrendered to you. I was smart enough not to give you the chance to do that to me. Seems you have a lot in common with these guys. What do you say about these actions of yours. I have even seen you in long lines with naked men just standing around.

I am not sure, but I believe you even oiled up your body to roll around in the grass WIth some of these muscular men. My, My what a bloody shame to have to remember you like that.

Just thought you might enjoy the way people can twist the truth. You tell a story a certain way to enough people, enough times and some are going to believe it. What a shame. They want attention and special privileges and positions of power..Blacks have done it and they are following what they did to get what they want. Watch out for the Islams, they are doing it also. They get political power than we suffer for not stopping them when we could. Give way to the underdog. However, that is now the average guy.

I find your comments quite enjoyable. Keep in touch.

Curt Shearer

My Personal Thoughts: What do these Homosexuals want?

White Pride?

All these laws which force people to like and tolerate each other only work with the big stick i.e. the Law but if you favour some groups above other you will get a backlash and you make the intolerance worse then what it was. Its People who need to live together in harmony and positve discrimination will never help that corse. Below is an example of how some people feel, you may not like it but you can not ignore it



WHITE" Pride”

This is great. It not only applies to the U.S but also throughout Europe and more recently in Australia. I have been wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other race is.....

Proud to be White

Michael Richards makes his point...............
Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a good point.


This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points...


Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this? There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc.

And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'... and that's OK..


But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink .. You call me a racist.


You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you... so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?


You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.


You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day.


You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.

You have Mobo (Music of Black Origin) Awards, yet black is allegedly a racist comment.

You have the NAACP. You have BET.... If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.


If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.


If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.


We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that??


A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.


If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.


There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US ..... Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.


In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.


You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.


You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.


I am proud... But you call me a racist.


Why is it that only whites can be racists??


There is nothing improper about this e-mail.. Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on. I sadly don't think many will. That's why we haveLOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country. We won't stand up for ourselves!


BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

It's not a crime YET.... but getting very close!



It is estimated that ONLY 5% of those reaching this point in this e-mail, will pass it on.

Poem for immigrants

I cross ocean, poor and broke.
Take bus, see employment folk.

Nice man treat me good in there.
Say I need to see welfare.


Welfare say, 'You come no more, we send cash right to your door.'

Welfare cheques - they make you wealthy! NHS - it keep you healthy!

By and by, I get plenty money.
Thanks to you, you British dummy!

Write to friends in motherland.
Tell them 'come fast as you can.'

They come in turbans and Ford trucks,
And buy big house with welfare bucks!

They come here, we live together.
More welfare cheques, it gets better!

Fourteen families, they moving in,
but neighbour's patience wearing thin.
Finally, British guy moves away.
Now I buy his house, then I say,

'Find more immigrants for house to rent.'
And in the yard I put a tent.

Everything is very good,
and soon we own the neighbourhood.

We have hobby, it's called breeding.. Welfare pay for baby feeding.
Kids need dentist? Wives need pills? We get free! We got no bills!
British crazy! They work all year, to keep the welfare running here.
We think UK darn good place.
Too darn good for British race!
If they no like us, they can scram. Got lots of room in Afghanistan !


PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERY BRITISH TAXPAYER YOU KNOW

A tribute to a Soldier

He was getting old and paunchy
And his hair was falling fast,
And he sat around the Legion,
Telling stories of the past.

Of a war that he once fought in
And the deeds that he had done,
In his exploits with his buddies;
They were heroes, every one.

And 'tho sometimes to his neighbors
His tales became a joke,
All his buddies listened quietly
For they knew where of he spoke.

But we'll hear his tales no longer,
For ol' Bob has passed away,
And the world's a little poorer
For a Soldier died today.

He won't be mourned by many,
Just his children and his wife.
For he lived an ordinary,
Very quiet sort of life..



He held a job and raised a family,
Going quietly on his way;
And the world won't note his passing,
'Tho a Soldier died today..

When politicians leave this earth,
Their bodies lie in state,
While thousands note their passing,
And proclaim that they were great.



Papers tell of their life stories
From the time that they were young
But the passing of a Soldier
Goes unnoticed, and unsung.

Is the greatest contribution
To the welfare of our land,
Some jerk who breaks his promise
And cons his fellow man?

Or the ordinary fellow
Who in times of war and strife,
Goes off to serve his country
And offers up his life?

The politician's stipend
And the style in which he lives,
Are often disproportionate,
To the service that he gives.

While the ordinary Soldier,
Who offered up his all,
Is paid off with a medal
And perhaps a pension, small.



It's so easy to forget them,
For it is so many times
That our Bobs and Jims and Johnny's,
Went to battle, but we know,

It is not the politicians
With their compromise and ploys,
Who won for us the freedom
That our country now enjoys.



Should you find yourself in danger,
With your enemies at hand,
Would you really want some cop-out,
With his ever waffling stand?

Or would you want a Soldier--
His home, his country, his kin,
Just a common Soldier,
Who would fight until the end.

He was just a common Soldier,
And his ranks are growing thin,
But his presence should remind us
We may need his like again.



For when countries are in conflict,
We find the Soldier's part
Is to clean up all the troubles
That the politicians start.

If we cannot do him honor
While he's here to hear the praise,
Then at least let's give him homage
At the ending of his days.

Perhaps just a simple headline
In the paper that might say:
"OUR COUNTRY IS IN MOURNING,
A SOLDIER DIED TODAY."



Pass On The Patriotism!


YOU can make a difference


A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life,

wrote a blank cheque made payable to 'The UK' or

'The United States' , ‘Canada’, ‘Australia’, for an amount

"up to and including my life."


That is Honour, and there are way too many people

in this country who no longer understand it.

Uzbeks and Craig Murray

I have just listened to Play on Radio 4 entitled “Murder in Samarkand” it was about Craig Murray who ran the British Embassy in Uzbekistan and the book that was written about him. Those who do not know the story it is about Craig Murray trying to bring to the attention of the Civil Service under a Labour Government that Human rights in Uzbekistan was practically nil. He maintains that information about Bin Laden given by the Uzbeks Government to British and US intelligence was unsafe as it had been obtained by torturing ordinary people not terrorists. The reason the Uzbeks were giving the information the Brits and US wanted to here was quite simply money, both governments were pouring money into Uzbekistan to keep them on side. Now whether this is true or not I do not know but it did make me think.
The row over torture at the moment does make one think, I for one do not believe any of those Human Rights Lawyers who are defending those terrorists arrested by the US and UK, the lawyers have no concept of right or wrong it is purely about getting an extortionate fee from the British Taxpayer. As for the Terrorists or should I say suspected terrorists how can they prove they have been tortured taped conversations, video, photographs, witness statements NO by definition if they had been tortured by the US secret service there would be no evidence, it is there word only and for why money again. They will come out with a huge lump of compensation paid for by the British tax payer which will most probably go back to help fund killing more innocent victims. Yet to take on information from dubious countries who have alter alterative motives does seem somewhat crass to say the least. This whole story seems to circle around the Iraq War, I wonder if we will ever hear the truth and I wonder how those minister who were involved can sleep but I expect they will by counting pounds going into the bank

Martin Clarke

What do these Homosexuals want?

What is it with Homosexuals over the last 30 years and especially under this government they have achieved powers and acceptance by the political establishment in fact they have more rights then the majority. This minority group accounts for about 4% of the population although they maybe accepted into polite society they still crave from Society the one thing they are not and that is NORMAL. They will try and convince people that it was Homosexual ls that produced the best human beings. They will cite a famous person from the past and say he or she was homosexual without any proof why because it legitimises there cause. One case was after John Wayne died there was a photograph of him tight shorts and a shoulder bag so therefore he must be homosexual Rubbish,
So why have I jumped on my hobby horse it is the fact that now according to the Gospel of Eltam John JESUS CHRIST was Homosexual so now Homosexuals what us to believe that the Son of God was Homosexual and that Christianity was the result of Homosexual plot. I do not know many Homosexuals but I would have thought the great majority want be left alone to get on with their lives, well its about time they stood up against these Loony Militants and their leaders in Stonewall

More on Helen

Helen Archers Mother the dominant Archer has now decided that she knows where Helen is coming from and has decided to give her support and warned her Husband that he must do the same as good parents. What rubbish good parents would be adamant in there disapproval of the whole thing, the husband Tony should turn round and say I want nothing to do with it but this middle class, veggie, liberal women and she knows that when the child is born everyone will gather round to support this selfish women not for Helen's sake but for the child who has no choice in its parents. The child can look to being totally dominated and absorbed by women a very unnaturally life style is this why scientists developed IVF I doubt it

Morals and Helen Archer

I have recently reached 60 so I thought it would be good time to put down what I thought of the last 60 years, the one re-occurring thing was the drop in moral and ethical standards. This I believe was highlighted in an edition of the Archers on Wednesday night where Debbie Archer announces that she is going to have a baby by IVF treatment, now Helen is 30 not married and not in a relationship. She tells her parents that she WANTS a baby and gives no more reason that she WANTS.


The ideal way to bring up a child is with a Mother and Father preferably married (there is sufficient evidence to back this up) but at the very least a Male and Female couple in a stable relationship (Not a Male and Male or Female and Female), so logic dictates that if we want children they should be brought up in the best way possible which is a Mum and Dad. That is in ideal world but sometimes bad things happen a Mum or Dad dies leaving a single parent or the Mum and Dad divorce or split up again leaving a single parent but this group tried to do the norm but have been left in a difficult situation. Next are those who get pregnant by mistake (I find it hard to believe in this day that this still happens) and the father of the child is not around. Then we have the final group who intentionally get pregnant either by a surrogate father or by IVF and have no intentions of having a father involved. This group treat the idea of having children as having a commodity, do they ever stop thinking rather then what they want and think what is best for the child. First the Child will be without a Father, to lose a father must be traumatic but to never have one and to be told in later life that this was intentional must be soul destroying. Having a man involve in child life is very important, plus an extended family i.e. the father relatives helps develop the character of the child. What of work these people make the choice to have a child without a father so why should the tax payer pay for them, so the mother takes on a full time job and employs a nanny, yet a child needs its mother and not just at weekends? So Debbie do not expect a well balanced child or adult when they get older, before any of you write in saying my daughter, son, friend etc has done a really good job accept the fact they are the exceptions not the rule.

When I was 20 I knew of no one who was living together (shacked up or living in sin) I think I only knew a couple of people who were divorced, I knew of no unmarried mothers and only knew of one girl who was pregnant at 16 she married straight away and is still married to the same person now. So was I living in shackled society frightened of my own sexuality or was I living in an era that had a Moral and Ethical Code?



Martin Clarke

Immigrants Work and Flats

I have great difficulty understanding this Government and the Employers of Foreign Labour, the Government according to newspaper articles have deliberately encouraged these legal and illegal immigrants to take work from our own people, yet for the government it is financially disaster. The foreign work force pays little or no tax because they are on minimum wage plus there is a great deal of black labour (that is not reference to a person skin colour it means working illegally), the indigenous work force they have replaced is forced on to the dole, which cost us the country money plus if they were working they would be on higher wages and thus paying higher tax. As for British employers to me it is only greed that forces them to employ foreign labour they and their shareholders want the highest return they have no compassion for their fellow countryman. Yes I have heard there excuses that customers want the best price if that were the case Councils should not go for the cheapest price they should go for the one who has offered best value and best product. More and more people are beginning to realise that the standard of work by foreign labour is not up to the standard of British Workers, those who purchased foreign built houses will tell you the faults once they have been in for a year, plus any of you who have been to Poland, Russia, Bulgaria etc will tell you the standard of their workmanship. So how do these foreign workers survive easy they share houses, packing in as many as they can this cuts the cost, plus according to the press some live in tents and caravans on the job,

Until the Government (who ever that is) starting to put the interest of its own people first you will never get a harmonised societies on the contrary it will lead to civil unrest and then riots.

As someone who owns flats and rent them I am continually asked why I do not rent to immigrants here is why:

1) They can not read English and can not read the Rental agreement

2) They cannot get a CRB check

3) They are not prepared to get references

4) Experiences from other Landlords make me wary:

a) You rent to one person and they start bringing other people, which causes a great deal of inconvenience to other tenants

b) A friend of mine rented her house to a couple while she was in Hong Kong when she returned they had sublet to Bedroom area and converted the loft into a Bedroom with planning or building regulations, on another occasions they have been no to convert loft space without permission timber from pallets

5) Finally I will always give preference to a British Subject this is my duty to help the local populace first









Martin Clarke

Open Letter SBC

Open Letter To Swale Borough Council

Chief Executive Swale Borough Council

Dear Sir

I attended the Display of the new plans for the new road going in at Bapchild the exhibition was held at Hempstead house. It was disappointing to see that no Swale Borough Council Official was present only KCC Officials especially as there are 600 houses proposed for the area.

The question I would have asked was “Does the Council have any power when granting planning permission on what builder can be used and who they employ?” As we are in a very bad recession and the great majority of builders being unemployed, can we be assured that employment be given first to local people, followed by British Subjects or will we be inundated by Foreign cheap labour.

Yours faithfully

Martin Clarke 118 East Street Sittingbourne ME10 4RX

Global Warming What is the truth

For those who have doubts of Global warning should read the following articles

http://www.martinclarkenews.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Global%20Warming%20Scare.pdf

Tory Pledge on Travellers

Gordon welcomes renewed Tory pledge on travellers




Local Conservative Parliamentary Candidate, Gordon Henderson, has welcomed a renewed pledge by David Cameron to clamp down on legal loopholes that allow travellers to exploit the planning system.



Proposals announced this week would see scrapped planning rules which compel councils to build sites for travellers on Green Belt land, as would the right of travellers to claim special treatment under the Human Rights Act, which the Tories would replace with a British Bill of Rights.



Bob Neill MP, Tory spokesman for local government and planning, contrasted the difficulties homeowners have in obtaining planning permission to build on rural land with the special treatment given to travellers.



“The British public want to see fair play for all, rather than special treatment being given to some. Labour’s changes have undermined community cohesion by creating a legitimate sense of injustice in the planning system.”



Currently, Government “diversity and equality” planning guidelines call for “positive action” and tell planners to give minority groups like travellers special treatment in the planning process (Hansard, 9th Feb 2009, Col.1700WA). Promoting “diversity and equality” is now a material consideration in the planning process, but the effect on house prices from an illegal traveller camp is not (Hansard, 9th Sept 2009, Col. 2014WA).



This two tier planning system is the root cause of the current controversy in Bobbing which has seen planning officers recommending approval for a planning application submitted by a gypsy family to develop land that is sited in an important countryside gap, on which the previous owners were refused permission to build a bungalow.



Welcoming Mr Neill’s statement Mr Henderson said:



“Bob is right. It is scandalously unfair that there is one set of rules for local settled people who want to build new homes, or, make alterations to their houses, and an entirely different set for travellers who have been given special treatment and appear to be able to build where they like.



“I am delighted that David Cameron has recognised this unfairness and has promised to change planning rules to give more say to local people, rather than be dictated to by bureaucrats in Whitehall and politicians in Westminster.”

…ends…

Ladies Self Defence Course

http://www.youngjudoclub.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/self%20defence.pdfhttp://www.youngjudoclub.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/self%20defence.pdf

Read This Article about the NON BRITISH Binyam Mohamed

How should we grill terrorists - with a cuddle and a cup of tea?By Richard Littlejohn


Last updated at 12:56 AM on 12th February 2010

Comments (75) Add to My Stories British intelligence officers are accused of colluding in the alleged torture of terror suspect Binyam Mohamed

Maybe I'm in a minority of one here, but I still don't understand the fuss over Binyam Mohamed.



He has become the poster boy for all those who want to undermine our security services and destroy our special relationship with the United States.

Why did the Government go to such lengths to secure his release from Guantanamo Bay and then charter a private jet to fly him 'home' to Britain?

For the umpteenth time, he's not British. He's not even a British 'resident'.



He is an Ethiopian national who lived here for a few years before choosing to move to Afghanistan, where he is said to have attended an Alky Ada training camp.

At the time of his arrest, he was attempting to board a plane in Pakistan using a forged passport.

Frankly, he is not our responsibility. We owe him nothing. Why would anyone in their right mind want him back?

British intelligence officers are accused of colluding in his alleged torture on the basis of supplying a few pertinent questions to his interrogators about what he got up to while he was living here.

That's their job, for heaven's sake. They would be failing in their duty if they didn't make every attempt to glean information from suspected terrorists who want to do us harm.

No one is actually accusing any British officer of physically torturing him, merely of turning a blind eye. There is a legitimate debate as to whether he was tortured at all, in the true sense of the word.





More...Angry U.S. warns there will be a price for Britain to pay after judges reveal MI5 DID collude in abuse of terror suspects

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Torture, a cover-up and Labour's shame

The spycatcher who broke our enemies the old British way



While at Gitmo, he was shackled and deprived of sleep - practices approved at the time by the White House. He is also said to have suffered severe mental stress over threats that he would be removed from U.S. custody and transferred to a more cruel regime.

OK, so the Americans put the frighteners on him, but if they hadn't cared less whether he lived or died, they wouldn't have had him on suicide watch.

His treatment wasn't pretty, but it has to be put in context of the 3,000 people killed in the worst-ever terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

As to his claims to have suffered genital mutilation while in CIA custody in Morocco, there has never been any firm evidence produced.



Binyam Mohamed maintains he went to Afghanistan not to train with the Taliban, but to confront his addiction to drugs and alcohol.

Most people would have signed up to AA (Alcoholics Anonymous, not Alky Ada) or checked themselves into The Priory. He travelled halfway round the world to one of the most inhospitable, tyrannical countries on Earth.

For a man said to have been in mortal terror of being tortured, he appears to have had no problem moving to a jurisdiction which would have cheerfully beheaded him or stoned him to death for taking a sip of alcohol.

The inconsistencies in his story are glaring, yet he has found a gullible audience for his fairy tales, including a fawning 'interview' on the BBC.

The prime movers behind this case appear to be motivated as much by rampant anti-Americanism as any concern about the Binman's 'yuman rites'.

We never hear such vociferous complaints against Pakistani treatment of terrorist prisoners. Yet intelligence gathered by Pakistan is said to have foiled countless plots in Britain and saved hundreds, perhaps thousands of lives.

How do you think this information is gained - with a cuddle and a nice cuppa tea?

It would be a dereliction of duty for MI5 to disregard this evidence on the grounds that it was obtained under duress.

No doubt I will be accused of condoning torture. I'm not, but it would be na've in the extreme to pretend it doesn't happen.

Binyam Mohamed may have been deprived of sleep, but there are plenty of dedicated men and women in the security services on both sides of the Atlantic who lie awake every night worrying about how they can protect us from terrorist attacks.

Their job is to keep us safe, and if 'yuman rites' isn't top of their 'to do' list then it's hardly surprising.

Leave the politics aside and keep your eyes on the prize. David Miliband may be a hapless Foreign Secretary, hopelessly out of his depth, but he was absolutely right to try to protect the confidentiality of intelligence sharing with the Americans.

Terrorism isn't just about indiscriminate murder, it's also about messing with our minds, unsettling our certainties. Alky Ada is practised in the art of turning our freedoms against us - whether flying civilian planes into buildings or exploiting our laws to pose as victims.

I repeat, I don't condone torture. But using the dubious claims of foreign terror suspects as a stick to beat British intelligence is counterproductive and dangerous.

The 'yuman rites' campaigners are crowing today. Next time a bomb goes off on a crowded Tube train, let's hope we don't discover it could have been prevented by evidence which had to be discarded because it was tainted by torture.







Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1250332/How-grill-terrorists--cuddle-cup-tea.html#ixzz0fJW4JW7U

Police love Bi Sexuals?

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Congratulations to Swale Borough Council Leader

I congratulate Cllr Andrew Bowles leader of the Council for his stand for the Householders of Swale, I refer to your article “Gipsy consultation plan is unbalanced”. The Labour Government have imposed on the people of Swale Traveller sites for 47 Traveller Caravans, it has offered “Work Shops” for Travellers and Councillors but no “Work Shops” for local residents who I might add pay Council Tax and Income Tax something the great majority of travellers do not pay. For the Political Correct Forces have always put the interest of minorities first and not even consider the majority, at long last we have politician in Cllr Andrew Bowles who has stood up for the majority, He has said NO this is unfair and unbalanced the residents (the majority) must have a say. Lets hope this is a sign for the future when we get a new government in May.
Final question If Travellers settle in these Camps and are no longer travelling do they lose their status and come under the laws the rest us have to abide by?

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

Have a look at Kent

http://www.yourkenttv.co.uk/channels/default.aspx?page=leisure&vid=3247

Is UKIP a mistake

Over the last few weeks I have seen UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) getting some considerable media coverage, most of what UKIP stands for I happen to agree with but it is the way of obtaining their aims I disagree with. The Political system in this country at General Election is first past the post or winner takes all, I was a firm believer in this system as it brings with it strong government but in the last 10 years strong government has turned into an elected dictatorship so have been converted to proportional representation. Yet we have to be pragmatic if you want a change of government you only really have two choices vote Labour or Conservative all the rest no matter how good they seem, are a protest vote or in the case of UKIP it could be the party who will stop a Conservative Candidate becoming an MP and let in a Labour or LIBDEM EU enthusiasts.
Recently the local UKIP Parliamentary candidate wrote me a personal letter saying I was wrong in my thoughts, I was impressed that he taken time out to do that he did not change my mind but I did take time to look at the UKIP prospectus which I found interesting and hopefully a future Conservative Government will take on their ideas. One of the things they want according a report in a Kent newspaper is the banning of the Burka something I would suggest makes common sense but one of their potential Canterbury City Council candidates has resigned because he believes this is a racist move. The interesting thing is that this candidate is Alex Ellis-Rosswell a 16 year old! I thought you could not vote or get elected till you was 18? Although I admire this young man getting involved in politics surely someone should have said you should learn to walk before you can run as he is barely out of short trousers what we need is Politicians with experience of life. The youth of today is being bombarded with propaganda from Europe and organisations like UKIP are trying to correct this imbalance which is a good thing and this is where there strength is, keeping the public informed rather then wasting their money on trying to get into parliament in seats which they have no hope of gaining, maybe they should try Borough and County Council elections that is where they will have a chance


Martin Clarke Sittingbourne