Can How can this Judge live with himself and to put a gagging order on the Victims Parents sounds more like a Communist then then a Democracy
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Monday, August 28, 2017
The other week a Young Women on to a local Facebook page was whining that she was losing her rented homed which she shared with her Baby. She was refused by lots of Landlords because she was on benefit.
So I asked the questions why was she on benefit and accepting Housing Benefit? That was the First mistake, second question and second mistake why is the father of the child not contributing to the child’s up keep? Her answer “he cleared off to Spain and I do not want his help”
Needless to say I came under attack by people on Facebook telling me it was non of my business.
Well it is my business as I am a Taxpayer and it is me who is paying for her benefit. His did not go well with the Facebook contributors who seem to think it is Governments duty to look after the feckless and absentee fathers responsabilities, well I do not. Now I have strange notion called I call it standing on your own 2 feet and being responsible for your own actions
Let me tell you in the 1970’s I had 3 young children it was the done thing in those days to marry the Mother of your Children and it was the duty of the Father to look after his family this rather quaint idea of taking responsibly for your action was quite popular back then. I hear from the younger generation especially those who ponce of the state that things were different back then, yes they were and the major difference was we live with in our means. Most of us did not have much money and yes there was full employment but not all jobs were well paid and being on the Dole was looked upon as shameful. As for todays ridiculous Working Tax credits which was designed to keep wages low and put bigger profits into the shareholders was never heard off as for Housing Benefit I am not sure that existed back then if it did I knew no one who was receiving it (Just looked on line started 1982). Mind you most Jobs had some security in those days and there was none of that disgusting Zero Hours Contract and it was in time where we controlled who came into our country.
I expect I will be attacked by all the spongers on their Lap Tops paid for by the Taxpayers after they have been to get their free food from the Food banks before they go to the pub and lets not forget all those Lefty Snowflakes who think Government should pay for everything but do not know where to get the money
IT USED TO A LEFTY SAYING “COME THE REVOLUTION” THAT SHOULD BE THE SAYING FOR US ON THE RIGHT.
Saturday, August 26, 2017
Antifa are just like the Nazi They wear a uniform and have their own flag carry weapons to intimidate people, they reject free speech, they destroy national monuments say certain books should be banned create Racial hatred YES they are true Nazis Hitler would be proud of of them
Friday, August 25, 2017
In a few weeks, a new intake of students will arrive, all fresh-faced and excited, at universities around the country. They’ll be thrilled at the prospect of escaping the wagging finger of mum and dad, eager to absorb new ideas. But I’m afraid they are in for a rude awakening. Unless they’re very fortunate, they will soon find themselves enveloped in a world that’s more censorious than stimulating and taught not to question ideas but to learn by heart the progressive creed. It will take a brave and resilient youngster to survive university with their intellectual curiosity intact.
Every aspect of campus life, from what you can say to how you should party, is minutely policed by what I called the Stepford Students in this magazine three years ago. ‘No Platform’ policies strictly govern who can speak on campus. Anybody, no matter what their political background or supposedly liberal credentials, can find themselves shunted off campus for having the wrong opinion in the eyes of the Stasi of student politics.
‘Safe Spaces’, controversy-free zones where students who find the real world brutalising can weep and hug ‘emotional support animals’ (this is not a joke), are almost compulsory. Newspapers are blacklisted: a growing number of student unions have banned the Sun, Mail and Express on the jumped-up basis that they’re racist and sexist and thus ‘harmful’. In the last academic year, even students at City University in London, famed for its journalism school, slapped a ban on tabloids. A journalism uni where you can’t read popular journalism? Thanks to the youthful jackboots of the National Union of Students, and the lily-livered vice-chancellors who bow down to them, the list of the undoable, unsayable and unthinkable grows longer every year. The adults have gone AWOL.
Any student society whose worldview isn’t a carbon copy of that of the NUS lives under permanent threat of censorship. Israel Society events are shouted down, pro-life groups are denied space at freshers’ fairs. At University College London, a Nietzsche Society was banned for fear it might stoke far-right thinking. Thus Spake the Censor.
The message from student officialdom is relentless: think like us, or else. The result is that university becomes less and less like university. They now resemble factories of conformism, training their student body not to think freely but to fear the eccentric, hide from the provocative, and prize their self-esteem more highly than their intellectual development.
In the three years since The Spectator named these Stepford Students, the situation has become far worse. Campus craziness has intensified. Worse, it has Americanised. Not content with subjecting our dreaming spires to No Platforming and middle-class prejudices about tabloid newspapers and lad culture, these young clones are gaily importing the worst excesses of America’s hysterical campus culture. This is very bad news, because if you look at what is happening on America’s campuses, you get a terrifying insight into the baleful influence that identity politics can have on everyday life and liberty. The trouble is that the ‘safe space’ mentality doesn’t stay contained on campus. Year after graduating year, students who have been trained to see safety as preferable to liberty and difficult questions as wounding to their self-esteem head out into the world, taking their ‘safe space’ mentality with them. Like B-movie blobs, safe spaces are breaking free and now threaten to swallow up public life.
America’s student radicals regularly punish speakers they disagree with. Student agitators at Brandeis University managed to cancel an honorary degree for Ayaan Hirsi Ali on the basis that she’s ‘Islamophobic’. Earlier this year, students at Middlebury College in Vermont physically assaulted an academic who was trying to protect Charles Murray, an invited speaker they considered racist. ‘Antifa’ activists and students at Berkeley started fires to prevent the alt-right Brit provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking. Berkeley was the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement in the 1960s, when students demanded more debate, not less. The anti-Milo protesters even burnt a replica of the simple banner reading ‘Free Speech’.
Our own student leaders assume their peers are morally feeble and must be protected from sore words or controversy. But in the US, they’ve gone deeper. Campus authoritarianism is darker, more driven by race. It governs not only ideology and opinion, but everyday conversation, and even dress. In the US, the student Stasi furiously condemn ‘cultural appropriation’, which is when a member of one racial group borrows the culture of another. They minutely police interaction between blacks and whites. Watch last year’s video of a black student at San Francisco State University physically confronting a white student with dreadlocks, and threatening to cut off his dreads because ‘that is my culture’, and you’ll see how terrifying this racial myopia can be. Watch the film of Yale students screaming hysterically in the face of a lecturer who had said that people should be able to wear whatever they wanted at Halloween and not worry about cultural insensitivity, and you will see the sheer intolerance that the cult of student sensitivity has unleashed.
Or observe what happened at Evergreen State College in Washington in May. When the biology professor Bert Weinstein refused to take part in a proposed day of racial segregation — a ‘Day of Absence’, students called it, when whites would agree not to turn up to college — all hell broke loose. Student mobs invaded lectures, they demanded Weinstein’s resignation, and they effectively imprisoned university bosses in their offices and refused to let them leave until they agreed to the students’ foul, divisive agenda. This was a step on from Stepford Students — this was Lord of the Flies-style student authoritarianism: menacing youths using mob tactics to enforce their reactionary programme.
Whether we like to admit it or not, in Britain we tend to ape American culture, especially youth culture. And now our students, always on the lookout for new ways to assert their tinpot authority, are beginning to imitate what’s happening across the Atlantic.
This year, Oxford’s equality and diversity unit warned staff that failing to make eye contact with certain students could be construed as racist, and that asking a student about his or her origins is a ‘micro-aggression’ liable to worsen mental ill health. (Oxford then rowed back on this advice on the grounds that it might be seen as discriminatory against people with autism who can’t look others in the eye. Jesus wept.) The NUS has declared war on racial micro-aggressions, which it describes as ‘covert, subtle’ forms of racism. It means everyday banter and blips in conversation that have no racist intent whatsoever but which the union feels must be policed anyhow.
Just as American colleges are under pressure to remove statues of old ‘problematic’ white men, so the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College London this year announced it would remove all the portraits and statues of its founders because… well, they’re all white. This historical cleansing of KCL to pre-empt and halt the racial fury of student radicals will of course only intensify student demands for racial correctness. Students want a Cecil Rhodes bust at Oriel College, Oxford, removed, for curricula across the country to be ‘de-colonised’, and for black students not to be expected to read so much ‘white philosophy’. That was in a demand by students at SOAS this year that ‘white philosophers’, including Enlightenment thinkers like Kant, be dropped from the syllabus in order to make black students feel less isolated.
The nasty, paternalistic American politics of racial thinking is imposed wholesale on British campus life — even though Britain’s social history is considerably less blighted by racism than America’s. In the past academic year, Cambridge was slammed by students for serving ‘culturally insensitive’ food (exotic dishes that didn’t properly reflect the countries they claimed to be from); the musical Aida was cancelled at Bristol University following a ‘student revolt’ over white students portraying Egyptian slaves; and Edinburgh University’s self-styled fancy-dress police insisted students mustn’t ever dress up as Pocahontas.
If our censorious students are going to import America’s campus insanity, they need to know that means they will also import its consequences. And those consequences are dire. No one can imagine that it’s a good thing to create a generation unable to stomach things it dislikes or disagrees with. How are they to survive in a pluralistic democracy? It’s vital to be able to hear people out, to have civilised disagreement, to engage in debate, to change your mind.
The ‘safe space’, by guarding students from the disagreeable, is churning out an army of hypersensitive dogmatists. We can see this in the US with the current outburst of statue-smashing. And we can see it in Europe with the alarming revelation that fewer and fewer young people believe in freedom of speech and democracy.
The other consequence of rampant PC in the US has been the rise of Trump. It’s becoming clear that the increasingly unhinged policing of academic, public and political life in the US, as gabbed about on Fox News every night, has generated bemusement and sometimes fury among ordinary people. The ‘safe space’ mentality has created a very unsafe backlash. Americans elected Trump precisely because he seemed to infuriate the bossy left-liberals who are suffocating free speech. And Trump deliberately inflames his voters’ outrage; he champions a new identity politics for the right. Trumpists now exist in large part to annoy the radical left, and the radical left, for its part, lives to infuriate them.
Will this polarised politics arrive here too? We have seen elements of what I call ‘vice-signalling’ Trumpist rhetoric from the contenders for Ukip’s leadership — but so far, mercifully, the British have remained immune. But we should beware: enforce PC and there will inevitably be a revolt against it. A Europe-wide poll this year found that only 46 per cent of Brits aged 18 to 21 think people should be free to ‘say what they want’. And polls of millennials frequently show that they’re more down on democracy than older generations.
This is what happens when we socialise youths to think censorship is good and other people’s opinions are bad, to believe mental safety is better than zany liberty: they lose faith in freedom and democracy. They will leave uni and populate public life with these views. This is how liberty dies.
Brendan O’Neill on campus culture.
Brendan O’Neill on campus culture.
WOW! Trump does the unthinkable, by Liz Crokin
Interesting to say the least.....
He may be a little different, but if anyone else did those same charitable actions, they would have it in big headlines.
This should be published in every newspaper across the US
Liz Crokin is an award-winning author, a seasoned journalist and an advocate for sex crime victims. Liz began her journey at the University of Iowa where she received a bachelor's in journalism
and political science.
Trump Does The Unthinkable,
by Liz Crokin
Donald Trump is a racist, bigot, sexist, xenophobe,
anti-Semitic and Islamophobe -- did I miss anything?.... He is also deplorable.
The left and the media launch these hideous kinds of attacks at Trump everyday; yet nothing could be further from the truth about the real estate mogul.
As an entertainment journalist, I've had the opportunity
to cover Trump for over a decade, and in all my years covering him I've never heard anything negative about the man until he announced he was running for president
Keep in mind, I got paid a lot of money to dig up dirt on celebrities like Trump for a living so a scandalous story on the famous billionaire could've potentially sold a lot
of magazines and would've been a huge feather in my cap. Instead, I found that he doesn't drink alcohol or
do drugs, he's a hardworking businessman.
On top of that, he's one of the most generous celebrities in the world with a heart filled with more gold than his $100 million New York penthouse. Since the media has failed so miserably at reporting the truth about Trump,
I decided to put together some of the acts of kindness he's committed over three decades which has gone virtually unnoticed or fallen on deaf ears.
In 1986, Trump prevented the foreclosure of Annabell Hill's family farm after her husband committed suicide. Trump personally phoned down to the auction to stop the sale of her home and offered the widow money. Trump decided to take action after he saw Hill's pleas for help in news reports.
In 1988, a commercial airline refused to fly Andrew Ten, a sick Orthodox Jewish child with a rare illness, across the country to get medical care because he had to travel with an elaborate life-support system. His grief stricken parents contacted Trump for help and he didn't hesitate to send his own plane to take the child from Los Angeles to New York so he could get his treatment.
In 1991, 200 Marines who served in Operation Desert Storm spent time at Camp Lejune in North Carolina before they were scheduled to return home to their families. However, the Marines were told that a mistake had been made and an aircraft would not be able to take them home on their scheduled departure date. When Trump got wind of this, he sent his plane to make two trips from North Carolina to Miami to safely return the Gulf War Marines to their loved ones.
In 1995, a motorist stopped to help Trump after the limo he was traveling in got a flat tire. Trump asked the Good Samaritan how he could repay him for his help. All the man asked for was a bouquet of flowers for his wife. A few weeks later Trump sent the flowers with a note that read: We've paid off your mortgage.
In 1996, Trump filed a lawsuit against the city of Palm Beach, Florida, accusing the town of discriminating against his Mar-a-Lago resort club because it allowed Jews and blacks. Abraham Foxman, who was the Anti-Defamation League Director at the time, said Trump put the light on Palm Beach not on the beauty and the glitter, but on its seamier side of discrimination. Foxman also noted that Trump's charge had a trickle-down effect because other clubs followed his lead and began admitting Jews and blacks.
In 2000, Maury Povich featured a little girl named Megan who struggled with Brittle Bone Disease on his show and Trump happened to be watching. Trump said the little girl's story and positive attitude touched his heart. So he contacted Maury and gifted the little girl and her family with a very generous check.
In 2008, after Jennifer Hudson's family members were tragically murdered in Chicago, Trump put the Oscar-winning actress and her family up at his Windy City hotel for free. In addition to that, Trump's security took extra measures to ensure Hudson and her family members were safe during such a difficult time.
In 2013, New York bus driver Darnell Barton spotted a woman close to the edge of a bridge staring at traffic below as he drove by. He stopped the bus, got out and put his arm around the woman and saved her life by convincing her to not jump. When Trump heard about this story, he sent the hero bus driver a check simply because he believed his good deed deserved to be rewarded.
In 2014, Trump gave $25,000 to Sgt. Andrew Tamoressi after he spent seven months in a Mexican jail for accidentally crossing the US-Mexico border. President Barack Obama couldn't even be bothered to make one phone call to assist with the United States Marine's release; however, Trump opened his pocketbook to help this serviceman get back on his feet.
In 2016, Melissa Consin Young attended a Trump rally and tearfully thanked Trump for changing her life. She said she proudly stood on stage with Trump as Miss Wisconsin USA in 2005. However, years later she found herself struggling with an incurable illness and during her darkest days she explained that she received a handwritten letter from Trump telling her she's the bravest woman I know. She said the opportunities that she got from Trump and his organizations ultimately provided her Mexican-American son with a full-ride to college.
Lynne Patton, a black female executive for the Trump Organization, released a statement in 2016 defending her boss against accusations that he's a racist and a bigot. She tearfully revealed how she's struggled with substance abuse and addiction for years. Instead of kicking her to the curb, she said the Trump Organization and his entire family loyally stood by her through immensely difficult times.
Donald Trump's kindness knows no bounds and his generosity has and continues to touch the lives of people from every sex, race and religion. When Trump sees someone in need, he wants to help. Two decades ago, Oprah asked Trump in a TV interview if he'd run for president. He said: If it got so bad, I would never want to rule it out totally, because I really am tired of seeing what's happening with this country. That day has come.
Trump sees that America is in need and he wants to help. How unthinkable! On the other hand, have you ever heard of Hillary or Obama ever doing such things with their own resources?
Now that's really unthinkable!
Might be worth passing on!
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
As the left tries to draw the line of demarcation for the second American Civil War in the week since Charlottesville, history is being rewritten to tarnish whites as inherently evil, while ignoring the fact that Arabs started the slave trade and Muslims continue to hold 27 million Africans as slaves today. Islam and Islamic Supremacy has always been the true threat to a free world, and if the left cared about slavery or oppression, they would be addressing the very serious issues.
A brief history of slavery that the leftist-controlled American school system will not tell students: the largest concentration of slaves (and the name slave) comes from the Eastern European Slavic people, who were captured by Algerian Muslims well into the 19th century. Nearly all civilizations held slaves, and on American shores, that included Aztecs, Mayans, and Native Americans (who were actually allowed to keep their African-American slaves after the Civil War). The oldest known written reference to slavery is the Hammurabi Code, which is an ancient Babylonian set of laws from Mesopotamia. Egyptians followed this code while using labor from the enslaved Jewish race to build monuments, such as the tourist destination known as the Great Pyramids.
The slave trade originated with Arabs, and when Islam overtook the region, slavery became a bedrock of the Quran. Both sexual slavery and forced servitude are still prevalent today in Muslim society. Mohammed was an owner and trader of both (Bukhari 34:351), and like any good Muslim, his followers are encouraged to live as he did. At the dawn of the first millennium, Muslim societies grew in such a manner that the natural slave population could not procreate fast enough to meet the demand, therefore Muslims were the first people to import slaves from other races and regions to fill the demand for slave labor. Despite Muslim scholars promising Islamic slavery was never cruel, Islamic treatment of slaves was so horrific historically that it has prompted many uprisings; one that lives in infamy is the Zanj Rebellion, which was a fourteen-year insurrection between Muslims and their slaves.
The Quran refers to all slaves as ma malakat aymanukum (meaning “that which the right hand owns”), while sharia law today for the most part only uses that reference for slaves captured in war. Nonetheless, the effect is the same: a person who is owned by another. Islamic Supremacy mandates that only non-Muslims can be kept as slaves, and the Quran specifically lays out that slaves are not worth the same in the eyes of Allah as a free person in verse 16:75:
“Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah.”
Sexual slavery is heavily referenced in the Quran and hadiths. There are four separate Quran verses for instructing Muslims how to keep their sex slaves, but zero verses instructing followers to pray (Quran 4:24; 8:69; 23:5-6; 33:50). After Mohammed and his men killed rival men in battle, their women were taken as sex slaves and raped with the permission of Allah (Bukhari 62:137). In modern-day America, Georgetown University Professor and American-born Muslim convert Jonathan Brown makes good use of his Islamic fellowship salary funded by Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal by lecturing students on how it was a “privilege” to be a slave in the Muslim world. As for non-consensual sex, Brown stated that, “[f]or most of human history, human beings have not thought of consent as the essential feature of morally correct sexual activity.” The lecture can be viewed in its entirety here.
Brown isn’t the only American contemporary advocating the positives of sharia-compliant slavery. In Austin, Texas, at an Islamic Relief (IR) fundraiser in 2016, Abdul Nasir Jangda stated that, “Slavery in Islam… is vastly different and superior morally and spiritually to the atrocious, obscene, and vile Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.” It is important to note that Jangda was born and raised in Houston, Texas. His colleague, Hussain Kamani, was also at the same dinner and stated that, “If a person wishes to fulfil his desires, his common desires, there are only two ways he can fulfill these desires where he will not be held responsible for it. … The first thing is that he fulfills his desires with a spouse. The second thing is that he fulfills his desires with a female slave that belongs to him.”
While the United States abolished slavery two centuries ago at the demands of its own citizens, Saudi Arabia and Yemen didn’t follow suit until 1962, and that was only under pressure from the British government. Oman eliminated slavery in 1970. African countries under majority Muslim control such as Chad, Niger, Mali and Sudan have at millions of slaves today according to the United Nations. Although Mauritania technically outlawed slavery in 2007, there is still a large population of slaves under Islamic control currently. Regions like India and Pakistan are also rife with Islamic sex slaves, but get little to no media attention.
If anyone fighting against Trump cared about slavery or true oppression, they would be fighting for the people who are slaves under Islamic rule today and fighting against the Islamists who are trying to make the West sharia-compliant. But we already know the left isn’t fighting against Trump to ensure equality for minorities today; the left wants revenge for perceived wrongs they feel their ancestors endured at the hands of whites, thanks to the false leftist narrative being pushed by the mainstream media. Later this week, we will have a more in-depth article detailing the horrors of modern day human trafficking in Islamic countries, including the extremely disturbing and under-reported sector of child camel jockeys. Please stay tuned for ways you can raise awareness and help combat the horrors of Islamic Supremacy.