15 years in Prison and she never murdered anyone

Personal trainer, 36, had sex with client, 14, during two years of workouts in his home

GOOD but she would have got less if she murdered him - Is the crime worth 15 yuers though?

• Suni Faith Anderson jailed for up to 15 years
  
• Victim's mother stood up and blasted Suni in court

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095441/Personal-trainer-Suni-Faith-Andeson-36-sex-client-14-years-workouts-home.html#ixzz1lJCn6NFw

A Must Read

I am not sure whether I breaking any copy right laws by copying this to my blog but it is a must read. Especially with reference to the family in wales

Sky TV, Special Brew, Superkings...those benefit cuts in full
By Richard Littlejohn

Last updated at 7:53 AM on 3rd February 2012

Call Me Dave repeatedly challenged Mister Ed in the Commons this week to agree that families on welfare should not be better off than those who go out to work. Answer came there none.


Labour is still refusing to support Government plans to cap benefits at £26,000 a year — equivalent to the average annual household income.


Opposition MPs again voted en masse against the reforms, which have been thrown out of the House of Lords by a holier-than-thou alliance of Labour peers and bolshie bishops.

 

Clash: David Cameron has been challenging Ed Miliband over his party's refusal to support the Government's proposed £26,000 cap on benefits

It now looks as if ministers will wheel out a rarely used constitutional battering ram to force the Bill through Parliament in time for it to become law by April next year.


Cameron has already watered down the plans, by offering concessions such as a nine-month grace period for those who have recently lost their jobs through no fault of their own, and setting up a £130 million transitional fund to help families who have to move house because they can no longer afford the rent.


But he insists, quite rightly, that the headline £26,000 figure (£500 a week tax-free) is non-negotiable. A working family would have to earn £35,000 before tax to take home that amount.

More from Richard Littlejohn...

• RBS: How to make a pig's ear out of a dog's breakfast 30/01/12
• At this rate we'll all be selling The Big Issue 23/01/12
• Sorry, you can't phone a friend, Mummy... 19/01/12
• The worst job I ever had...An Ed Miliband lookalike 16/01/12
• Good evening, I'm from Ethics, in case you couldn't tell! 12/01/12
• Widescreen TVs, porn films, an antique fireplace.... so just how did you get away with fleecing the taxpayer, Jackboots? 10/01/12
• Don't drink that lager Guv, it's not worth it... 05/01/12
• Howzat! Now they've got us all by the googlies 02/01/12
• VIEW FULL ARCHIVE

Millions of people on low and fixed incomes have to live on far less, which is why these proposals enjoy widespread public support.


Opponents of the cap have whipped themselves up into a self-righteous lather of lunacy, screeching hysterically about ‘social cleansing’ and ‘plunging families into poverty’.


While just about stopping short of accusing Cameron of wanting to pitchfork bay-bees, Labour stubbornly refuses to go along with the reforms.


In the Commons, the Prime Minister justifiably taunted Miliband: ‘People up and down the country will be completely amazed that the party that is supposed to stand up for working people thinks that it is OK to get more on benefits than a family gets from working.’


Labour maintains that the plans are unfair and accuses the Government of taking too much notice of newspaper stories about asylum seekers being billeted in six and seven-bedroom mansions and receiving over £100,000 a year in benefits. It’s only in London, where the cost of living is sky-high, that these ‘abuses’ are to be found, they claim.


In an attempt to clamber back on to the moral high-ground, some Labour politicians have even suggested that the cap could be lower outside London.


So, in the interests of ‘fairness’, let’s look further afield. The BBC has been doing sterling work in highlighting the ‘victims’ of the ‘savage’ cuts.


In London, it’s true, most of these ‘victims’ seem to be single mothers from overseas, many of them suffering from a range of exciting ‘disabilities’, and living in taxpayer-subsidised accommodation they couldn’t possibly afford if they went out to work.


But surely there are more deserving cases to be found in the provinces. Take this family from North Wales, whose plight is featured on the BBC website.


Cue violins.


Unemployed father-of-seven Raymond (not his real name) and his family rent a former council house on a social housing estate in North Wales. They do not own a car or take a regular annual holiday.


‘Raymond, a former educational software writer, has been jobless since 2001. His wife Katherine suffers from bipolar disorder with an anxiety disorder and is unable to work.


‘Ray, 45, says: “The market for my skills dried up ten years ago and there’s a total lack of work in my area of expertise.”

‘The couple share their home with six of their children — their five-year-old son, Raymond’s twin girls from his first marriage, and three of his wife’s four children from an earlier relationship.


‘The family receive a total of £30,284.80 a year in benefits — well over the £26,000 cap proposed by the Government.


‘But Raymond says: “If these proposals go through, we will take a massive hit to our finances. And it’s not as if we could move into a smaller or cheaper premises. I see eight people here having to choose between eating or heating.” ’


So let’s have a look at the old scoreboard. Ray’s family receives

£30,284.80 a year — that’s £4,284.80 above the proposed cap. So much for the argument that living costs, and therefore welfare bills, are lower outside London. Although he’s still only 45, he hasn’t worked for 11 years, claiming there’s no call for his skills.


Not in North Wales, maybe. But according to the recruitment website careerjet.co.uk there are currently 1,436 vacancies in the ‘educational software’ field across Britain. They’re not all in London and the South-East. For instance, there are jobs going in Derby and Stoke, each paying a starting salary of £50,000 a year.


Plenty of people move house or commute great distances to find work. If he didn’t fancy either of those options, Ray could always stay in Derby or Stoke during the week and go home at the weekend.


I’m sure his wife could manage without him. She doesn’t seem to leave the house much, owing to her condition. I hadn’t realised that ‘anxiety’ was a disability. Despite being ‘bi-polar’ she still thought it was a good idea to have another baby five years ago, even though Ray hadn’t worked since 2001.


Incidentally, how much does the father of her three children by a previous relationship contribute to their upkeep?


Next question.


Maybe the reason Raymond doesn’t bother looking for another job is that it wouldn’t be worth his while.


To take home £30,284 a year, he would have to earn just over £41,000 before tax. That’s only slightly below the point at which the 40p rate of income tax kicks in — and the Government thinks you’re so ‘rich’ you don’t need child benefit.


It’s a fair bet he’s already better off than his neighbours. Wages in North Wales are the lowest in Britain, averaging just £20,213 in Wrexham. So he would have to earn twice the local average salary to take home what he is paid, tax-free, in benefits.


Helpfully, the BBC website provides us with a handy breakdown of the family’s weekly expenditure.

More...

• RIGHTMINDS: Memo to Ed Miliband: Listen to your brother on benefits
• Working families 'betrayed by Labour' over benefit cap: Miliband makes last-ditch attempt to derail proposals
• Ed's little sandcastle turned into a puddle

This includes £15 a week for Sky TV. ‘We get the Sky Movies package because we’re stuck in the house all week — otherwise we wouldn’t have any entertainment,’ Ray explains.


Then there’s £32 a week on mobile phones. ‘My wife and I have mobile phones and so do all the teenage children. You try telling teenagers they’re going to have to do without their mobiles and there’ll be hell to pay.’


Since Ray and his wife are, by their own admission, stuck in the house all week, you might wonder why they need mobile phones. Perhaps she calls up to the bedroom to wake him when Pirates Of The Caribbean comes on Sky Movies of an afternoon.


The biggest chunk of their budget goes on the weekly shop, which includes 24 cans of lager, 200 cigarettes and a large pouch of tobacco.


‘On the cigarettes, my wife tried to give up, but she missed one appointment on the course and they threw her off it.’


Ain’t life a bitch?


Faced with a cut of £82.40 a week under the new cap, Ray claims they now have a stark choice between ‘eating or heating’.


They could always go without Sky Movies, six mobile phones and their weekly carton of Superkings. That would save them over £100 a week, — and they’d still have enough left over for two dozen cans of Special Brew and all the roll-ups they can smoke, without having to economise on food.


These are the kind of people Labour is determined to protect from economic reality at the expense of their neighbours who go out to work every day and have to live on half as much money.


Incredibly, this is the BBC’s idea of a sob story, designed to tug at our heart-strings over the cruel hardship caused by the ‘savage’ cuts.


You won’t be surprised to learn that none of the 1,264 people who had left comments on the website last night expressed much sympathy.


And coming up after the news, a Panorama special on the impact of the ‘savage’ welfare cuts on the Old Woman Who Lived In A Shoe.


The Old Woman, a self-employed Big Issue seller from Afghanistan, has so many children . . . she gets £50,000 a year in child benefit, £100,000 in housing benefit, £20,000 in disability benefit, Sky Multi-room, a regular weekly delivery of cigarettes and lager from Ocado.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2095623/UK-benefits-cap-welfare-reform-Sky-TV-Special-Brew-Superkings--benefit-cuts-full.html#ixzz1lJ9Ddm4S

Ken Clark a pillick

Can you believe this Euro Fanatic Ken Clark why should a murderer be released, murderes are less time them some what convicted of perjury

Killers' convictions could be erased in just SEVEN years under new 'rehabilitation' plans

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095697/Killers-convictions-erased-just-SEVEN-years-new-rehabilitation-plans.html#ixzz1lJ7gg6YN

I said to the wife you are going to get a few inches tonight (quote)

A white weekend in store! Four inches of snow to fall across Britain as mercury plummets to -10c

I said to the wife you are going to get a few inches tonight (quote)

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095355/UK-weather-3-inches-snow-fall-England-Saturday-cold-snap-grips-Britain.html#ixzz1lJ5nbzvW

SEX ADDICT

SEX ADDICT WHAT A LOAD OF RUBBISH This is a women who doen't want to work and makes something up to become a celeb How long before she has an agent and is in the Jungle crap

'Why not charge?': Eamonn Holmes shocks This Morning viewers as he asks sex addict why she hasn't turned to prostitution

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2094501/Eamonn-Holmes-asks-sex-addict-Crystal-Warren-turned-prostitution.html#ixzz1l7e3ZRLL

£1 Billion to India

Read this article and ask why we give to this country? I have always been a keen follower of Politics and believed that the British Politician is mainly honest but when I see articles like this I begin to wonder about Backhanders

Well that's gratitude! We give India £1bn in aid, THEY snub the UK and give France a £13bn jet contract

• Propaganda coup for Nicolas Sarkozy just days after he declared Britain has 'no industry'
• French firm Dassault Rafale slashes price of fighter jets to ensure deal

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2094610/France-swoops-rob-UK-13bn-Indian-jet-contract.html#ixzz1l7ZNjPwo

Global Warming and Gay Marriage

Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)

It seems the Global Warming Con is being found out or should I say Global Warming another way to tax us

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-global-warming--Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html#ixzz1kqEmjIFc

Archbishop of York tells David Cameron not to overrule the Bible and allow gay marriage

• Marriage is set in history and cannot be changed overnight. It should be between a man and a woman, Dr Sentamu says
• David Cameron has shown support for a gay marriage bill
• The church needs more 'black people'
• Lib Democrat Minister says the CofE would not have to administer the same-sex ceremonies but the Church says this would not uphold in court

I am sick to death of this 1% of the population getting the adulation from the politicians, media and entertainment business, while there is so much more that needs to be done in this country. All we hear from these people with deviant sexual desires that they want equality with normal sexed people but what they really want is more rights. The Archbishop puts up most my argument against Gay Marriage but also these peoples arguments that they want equality can apply to Brothers and Sisters who want to be married, Father and Daughter etc this to most of us is disgusting and dangerous and what about polygamy.? My point is once you open the floodgates you will not be able shut them.

TV Soaps are using their storylines as a form of propaganda and brainwashing to try and convince especially the Young that Homosexuality is something normal. The same process was used by the Nazis, Communists and other dictatorships to put their ideas across. Once again David Cameron has lost touch with reality and is using the Homosexuals to gain votes. The UK is lacking a Maggie Thatcher or Winston Churchill all the parties have weak leaders, when will a leader come and take over the UK and get us out of this mess

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093045/Archbishop-York-tells-David-Cameron-overrule-Bible-allow-gay-marriage.html#ixzz1kqO0YowW

STROKE

Stroke has a new indicator They say if you e-mail this to ten people, you stand a chance of saving one life. Will you send this along? Blood Clots/Stroke- They Now Have a Fourth Indicator, the Tongue. I will continue to forward this every time it comes around! STROKE: Remember the 1st Three Letters..... S.. T. R. STROKE IDENTIFICATION: During a BBQ, a woman stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) ...she said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes. They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Jane went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening. Jane's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 PMJane passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Jane would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead. It only takes a minute to read this. A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough. RECOGNIZING A STROKE Thank God for the sense to remember the '3' steps, STR. Read and Learn! Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke. Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions: S *Ask the individual to SMILE. T *Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently) (I.e. It is sunny out today.) R *Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency number immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher. New Sign of a Stroke -------- Stick out Your Tongue NOTE: Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out his tongue. If the tongue is 'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other that is also an indication of a stroke. A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved. I have done my part. Will you?

Human Rights

'Human rights laws put lives at risk': Cameron tells Euro court it harms fight against terror
WHY does Cameron even bother talking to those numskulls at the European Court there Judges did not even have the decency to talk to him, a leader of a Country. They are an arrogant bunch off dictators who enjoy an expensive lifestyle at our expense. At the last election we were  promised by the Conservatives that we would leave the ECHR and form our own British Court of Human Rights. SO WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THAT

Pakistani Beasts

What’s with Muslim Men and there total disregard of Females

This article is not the first one where Muslim men go out and either rape White Women or seduces them into prostitution and they are just as bad with Muslim women with their Honour killings and punishments. On the news this morning how I heard that our aid to Pakistan is going 100% on women (why we need to send money to Pakistan is another matter) and they quoted one 16 year old girl, her husband came home at 4 am and cut the girls nose and lip off because he was upset. If any one of my readers is a Moslem could they tell me if this is part of their religion? Or is it just some sort of barbaric act of Pakistani culture

'Strict Muslim' raped four women at knifepoint to 'punish them for being on the streets at night'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091669/Sunny-Islam-Strict-Muslim-raped-4-women-knifepoint-punish-them.html#ixzz1kYV12L45

Get stuck in

I was please if not some what surprised to see the Sittingbourne News printed my letter, the Gazette would only print letters which not to controversial, which was not good for local democracy. The normal lefties will come out to give me a good beating but who cares a least all of us are getting a forum to air our views. Something the Political Elite do not allow or if they do they ignore the majority.

The letter was meant to upset people and get people talking, I expect there will be the letter stating that so and so has worked but is now on the dole so why should I insult them. That is why at the beginning of the letter I said “Those who refuse to work” totally different to someone who wants to work but can not get a Job. I notice that the editor never put the whole letter in missing was “Getting to work is not easy and jobs are hard to find and the government are aware of this and will be allowing some discretion for those who genuinely want to work which I think is fair. On this subject can they start clearing out the foreigners who are taking our jobs and only allow them back when we have a job surplus and can I say to Employers that they have “A Duty of Moral Leadership and Financial Care to their less fortunate country man” because I am one of those who getting sick and tired of being told the majority of Englishman are too lazy to work, that is untrue. It is employers big firms, farmers who want cheap labour who will work 6 days a week 14 hours a day so they get a big porofit, can I suggest they start thinking of othes instead their greedy selves,

Martin Clarke

Apology

Dear Editor

In my anger at the Labour Party and the Bishops, I made some hasty mistakes in my letter which I apologise for:

1)      I said the highest limit was £25,000 I should have said £26,000

2)      I also said that you can rent a house for £700 pcm; I then calculated that to be £8,400 per anum. Which I then deducted this from the maximum payment of £25,000 leaving £219.23p per week after deducting services. This was totally incorrect as I forgot that unemployed can get up to £650 pcm Housing Benefit. So the figures should be£26,000 minus £1200 services and £600 per anum rent leaving  £465.38p per week

I do apologise to your readers for letting them think these people who refuse to work only have £219.23p per week to live instead it should have been £465.38p

Mind You a married man with children working at ASDA would like to have a take home pay of £400 plus

Another thing that annoys me is the single man does not get no where near the £26,000, I rent Flats and 3 of my tenants have lost their jobs in the last few years and what they get is the following Housing benefit maximum £450 pcm there rent is £480 pcm, they get their Council Tax paid for plus they get £68 per week Job Seekers Allowance. With that £68 per week they have to find £7.50 rent, Electric £5 per week (average) leaving them £55.50p for food and one of then, who is 60, has been told by the Unemployment Office he has to maintain a car so if a job is offered where there is no public transport he can travel. It is this group of people the Older Single Person who should be up in arms and being supported by the Government and Bishops but NO they are the FORGOTTEN ONES and they want to work.

Martin Clarke

Cheques for scrap

Scrap metal dealers to be banned from making cash payments to tackle 'epidemic' of thefts

About time to look at the trouble they caused in Ambridge
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2091418/Scrap-metal-dealers-banned-making-cash-payment-tackle-epidemic-thefts.html#ixzz1kSctG15O

Cuts on Housing benefits, Foreign cheats, Goodbye Scotland

The government wants to put a maximum limit of £25,000 per annum on what long term benefit claimants can get. Great Idea why should anyone who refuses to work be better off out of work, most are lazy benefit cheats. You can rent a three bedroom house in Swale for on average £700 pcm that’s £8,400 per annum, leaving 16,600 for everything else or £319.23p per week. Allowing £100 pw for services (gas, etc) remember you do not pay Council Tax this will leave you £219.23p pw not a fortune but enough to live on I would suggest. Yet Paddy Ashdown, the Labour party and the C of E Bishops think that this wrong and we should not mess around with the maximum limit as it will make people homeless. Did you know what statisticians and Government consider homeless? When more than one child shares a bedroom, if that is the case when I lived at Hythe Road for 13 years I was homeless as I had 3 bedrooms with 3 children and myself and my wife. I always have to laugh at the Church of England when they moan about how we treat the homeless yet they have £billons of property which can be converted into housing. A government minister has said that some will have to move from their current homes TO RIGHT why should someone who permanently unemployed live in a expensive area or live in rented accommodation which they cannot afford if they working. We have all read the papers and seen people who have are living on benefit in housing that cost over £2000 pcm.

Getting to work is not easy and jobs are hard to find and the government are aware of this and will be allowing some discretion for those who genuinely want to work which I think is fair. On this subject can they start clearing out the foreigners who are taking our jobs and only allow them back when we have a job surplus and can I say to Employers that they have “A Duty of Moral Leadership and Financial Care to their less fortunate country man”

Martin Clarke Sittingbourne

 foreigners being paid £2billion in benefits a year including 371,000 on the dole (and 5,000 claiming £42m in illegal handouts)

• DWP fraud probe after 5,000 illegal immigrants claim £42m in handouts to which they are not entitled
• 371,000 foreign nationals on out-of-work benefits
• 6% of all benefit claimants are foreigners, study finds

What is labour answer to this “It is racist to tell the Public” what a bunch of idiots
 

Did you read the piece about the Gender neutral child? Parents of a child decided that it was wrong to let people know the sex of their baby so this freaks sex was kept a secret and know it is at school he has been told he is a boy asked on youtube if there was any difference between boys and girls he said “NO” Surely this sort of social experiment should be considered Child Abuse

Scots devolution has been a raw deal for English say voters south of the border

Maybe putting up a border is not such a bad idea? If you read the article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2090384/Scots-devolution-raw-deal-English-say-voters-south-border.html#ixzz1kGtZTEmZ