Sunday, August 21, 2016

who is to blame for Syria?

Tragic victims of our deal with the devil 
Who can fail to be moved and grieved by the sight of a small child in distress? But please do not let your emotions stop you thinking.
The picture of the shocked Aleppo survivor, Omran Daqneesh, like that of the drowned child Alan Kurdi last year, should not be allowed to enforce a conformist opinion on the world.
The death of Alan Kurdi did not mean that it was wise to fling wide the borders of Europe (as Germany’s Angela Merkel now well knows).

The rescue of Omran Daqneesh should not make us side with the bloody and merciless Syrian rebels.
Why is Aleppo a war zone in the first place? Do you know? I will tell you. Syria was a peaceful country until it was deliberately destabilised by Saudi Arabia and its fanatical, sectarian Gulf allies, consumed with hatred for the Assad government and, above all, its ally Iran.
Worse, this monstrous intervention was supported by the USA, Britain and France, all sucking up to the Saudis for oil, money and arms contracts.
In the hope of bringing down Assad, we made a devil’s bargain with some of the worst fanatics in the Middle East, people who make Anjem Choudary look like the Vicar of Dibley.
We know of Britain’s role for certain because of the very strange case of Bherlin Gildo, a Swedish man accused by British authorities of attending a terror training camp in Syria. His trial collapsed in June 2015 because his defence lawyers argued that the terror groups he was accused of supporting had been helped by British intelligence.
The Assad state, as you might expect, defended itself against its attackers, helped in the end by Iran and Russia.
And the war which followed was the ruin of Syria, whose innocent people found their peaceful cities and landscape turned into a screaming battlefield, as it still is.
If you are truly grieved by the picture of poor little Omran, just be careful who you blame.

Friday, August 19, 2016

Athletes get paid

Comments
Description: aul O'Neill
Paul O'Neill They do get paid a living wage to be competitive athletes though and have the back up of all the systems in British sport medical psychological administration... so not exactly just cut and dried in that
Like · Reply · 2 · 1 hr
Description: ndrew Bell
Andrew Bell I don't think they should get a penny for medals. They're doing it for the honour and their country.
Like · Reply · 24 mins
Description: ichael Dargan
Michael Dargan Okay but most of those competitors as you put it, have to fund themselves to qualify. So it's easy to judge and dismiss them I guess. They also put a damn lot of work to get to the top of their game, which means they don't get to live a normal life. So really do I think they should get a bonus damn right!!! If our footballers get paid a huge sum to splash against the wall, am I going to begrudge real athletes from getting a pay day?! Nope :)
Like · Reply · 18 mins
Description: artin William Clarke
Martin William Clarke Football is a money making business that is why they are paid a lot. To become an Olympic Athlete you have to be a full time Time athlete sadly the world of the Amateur Olympian who works and trains has passed. Many Olympians become extremely rich because of their achievement (Why not) and sometime from sports that produced millionaires i.e Tennis Golf Some come from Sports which have money i.e equestrian etc these are not the same as say Boxing, Judo, shooting etc but I doubt if many of the British Medallist are self funded The question: is Tax payers money to produce Elite sportsman the correct way to get more people involved in Sport? I must say for a relatively small Island to produce so many medallists must tell the rest of the world something about our Elite system also proves that the British People can survive by themselves that is why we are leaving the EU.


Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Gender Identity Curriculum Angers Parents in Virginia

Watch this video clip and tell me you are not disgusted. These Perverts want to pervert children as young as 5. This in the USA but will soon be in the UK








Monday, August 15, 2016

Reply from Department education

Dear Mr Clarke



Thank you for your email of 2 August about your complaint against Westland’s School.



I was sorry to read your account of what your friend’s son has experienced at school. I appreciate this must be a difficult and distressing time for all of you.

It is unacceptable that your friend’s son has been subject to this kind of treatment. It is the government’s priority to ensure that every school tackles bullying effectively. Young people should be able to enjoy their education free from harassment or bullying. It is important that when a bullying incident occurs, schools respond in a way that supports the bullied and ensures that the bullying does not happen again.

It is unclear from your correspondence whether your friend has made a formal complaint to the school. He can raise a formal complaint by following the school’s complaint procedure. The school must provide parents with a copy of their policy on request and he should ensure that any correspondence is marked as a formal complaint.

I should explain that there is little scope for the Secretary of State to intervene in cases of this nature. She can only do so where a governing body or a local authority has failed to carry out a legal duty or has acted unreasonably in the performance of such duties.

I can explain more generally the measures that the government has in place to support schools to tackle bullying.
The government does not want any young person to go to school dreading the treatment they will get. It is never acceptable for a child to be victimised or harmed in any way. That is why this government has made preventing and tackling poor behaviour and bullying a top priority. Ministers have sent a clear message to schools that such behaviour is totally unacceptable and should not be tolerated.

By law all schools must have measures in place to prevent all forms of bullying amongst pupils. In addition the government has issued advice which sets out the steps schools can take to tackle bullying effectively and includes a section on prevention and intervention. You may wish to read this advice which is available at: http://tinyurl.com/tackling-bullying-advice.

Schools are held clearly to account by Ofsted for how well they deal with bullying. Since January 2012, school inspections focus on the four core areas of a school, one of which is behaviour and safety including bullying. Inspectors must consider pupils’ freedom from harassment, bullying and discrimination. This approach will encourage schools to focus on this area and improve where necessary.

Your friend may wish to report this matter to the ‘Director of Children’s Services’ at his local authority.

He may also find it helpful to view the document ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’, which can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education--2.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Your correspondence has been allocated reference number 2016-0037516. If you need to respond to us, please visit:https://www.education.gov.uk/contactus and quote your reference number.

As part of our commitment to improving the service we provide to our customers, we are interested in hearing your views and would welcome your comments via our website at: https://www.education.gov.uk/pctsurvey.

Yours sincerely

Marie Duffy 

Ministerial and Public Communications Division