I was directed to a Facebook page of a previous pupil who had the following Statement obviously he is not ashamed of his sexuality. His statement intrigued me so I have research it.
Those of us who have worked on a farm would often see Male animals bugger another male animal and if there were no females it was to practice the sexual act and if there were female it was a form of domination over rivals. The same happens in Human society with regard male and female rape but I had never come across the idea that Animals were Gay.
I came across and interesting article by Simon LeVay you can see the whole article http://www.narth.org/docs/animalmyth.html
"Homosexual" Animals Do Not Exist
In 1996, homosexual scientist Simon LeVay admitted that the evidence pointed to isolated acts, not to homosexuality:
Although homosexual behaviour is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behaviour to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.Despite the "homosexual" appearances of some animal behaviour, this behaviour does not stem from a "homosexual" instinct that is part of animal nature. Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain, explains:
Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behaviour that appears to be homosexual. Such behaviour cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behaviour encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction.
I recently watched a discussion on whether the The Catholic Church is a force for good. Speaking against were leading Homosexual Stephen Fry and Arch Left winger Christopher Hitchin at the end of the debate they convinced t80% of the audience that they were right and a force for good. Strange World that individual like these two can convince a massive audience that they are a Force for Good and the Catholic Church is not? The two were very good orators and managed to move the whole discussion to Homosexually, abortion contraception but larger issues of what the church does around the World were ignored both especially Hitchin's were very insulting to anyone who believed. Hitchins died in 2011 one wonders when he meets his maker whether he has regrets